2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ner.2019.8716973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method to generalize time-frequency coherence analysis between EEG or EMG signals during repetitive trials with high intra-subject variability in duration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These parameters set the timefrequency precision compromise to a 0.1 s -3 Hz precision window within the β (13-30 Hz) frequency band. To cope with the issue of inter-trial duration variability that can lead to power spectrum cancelation, a normalization procedure was used to obtain EEG and EMG time-frequency power and EEG-EMG coherence spectra with time expressed as a percentage of elbow extension movement time (Fauvet et al, 2019). This normalization step is designed as to preserve frequency content of signals and enable point-wise comparison between trials of different durations.…”
Section: Corticomuscular Coherence Analysis Corticomuscular Coherence Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters set the timefrequency precision compromise to a 0.1 s -3 Hz precision window within the β (13-30 Hz) frequency band. To cope with the issue of inter-trial duration variability that can lead to power spectrum cancelation, a normalization procedure was used to obtain EEG and EMG time-frequency power and EEG-EMG coherence spectra with time expressed as a percentage of elbow extension movement time (Fauvet et al, 2019). This normalization step is designed as to preserve frequency content of signals and enable point-wise comparison between trials of different durations.…”
Section: Corticomuscular Coherence Analysis Corticomuscular Coherence Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After epoching each continuous electrophysiological signal of interest 3 s before and 3 s after each movement and normalized them to account for inter-movement time variability, 31 the auto-spectra of each electroencephalographic and electromyographic signal were calculated. The parameters ‘nvoice’ (scale resolution of wavelets), ‘J1’ (number of scales) and ‘wavenumber’ (Morlet mother wavelet parameter) were, respectively, set to 7, 50 and 10 to yield accurate identification of oscillatory activity in the 0.23–79.97 Hz frequency range in 0.23 steps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electromyographic continuous data were band-stop filtered at 49–51 Hz ( Krauth et al, 2019 ) to remove power line noise. As was done in Fauvet et al (2019 , 2021) , Glories et al (2021) , and Delcamp et al (2022) , the EMG signal was then 3-100 Hz band-pass filtered to keep the denoised part of the EMG signal energy that is necessary for reliable quantification of intermuscular coherence in the frequency band of interest in the present study. All the filters were fourth-order, zero-lag Butterworth types.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For IMC analysis, the continuous EMG data were segmented from 3 s before and 3 s after each movement to limit the alteration of the ends of the signals during the pre-processing. Then the signals were normalized to account for inter-movement time variability ( Fauvet et al, 2019 ). During this step, the 3 s of retained signals at the movement’s ends were removed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%