2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method for measuring polymer–water partition coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our results for PDMS, relatively constant calculated subcooled liquid solubilities in low density polyethylene (LDPE) and octanol have been reported across the homologue series of PAHs, PCBs, and PBDEs, , and for PCBs and PCDDs, respectively. In our study, the subcooled liquid PDMS solubility of PCDDs and OCDF was approximately two times higher than that of the comparatively larger PCBs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar to our results for PDMS, relatively constant calculated subcooled liquid solubilities in low density polyethylene (LDPE) and octanol have been reported across the homologue series of PAHs, PCBs, and PBDEs, , and for PCBs and PCDDs, respectively. In our study, the subcooled liquid PDMS solubility of PCDDs and OCDF was approximately two times higher than that of the comparatively larger PCBs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The slope <1 means that more hydrophobic chemicals do not proportionally partition between octanol or hexane and PS. This is in contrast to the rubbery polymers PDMS and LDPE, for which the regressions of the log polymer-water partition constants with log K ow have slopes close to one while their absolute values are approximately one log-unit lower (log K PDMS/w ). , This difference might be the result of the inflexible matrix of the PS that is characterized by little void space, in which larger, more hydrophobic chemicals lack space thus do not accumulate to the same extent as in PDMS and LDPE, which are characterized by a large free volume between the molecules . We calculated apparent surface water partition constants K surf/w(apparent, 48h) from the absorbed concentration in the PS after 48 h in units of m 3 /m 2 to perform a comparison between the current and a literature study that determined 48-h partitioning of polycyclic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to PS (SI Figure S7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some of these additional studies, as well as some already included by Lohmann (2012), reported K PE‐w values determined at conditions other than those specified in the present study as “standard conditions” (i.e., freshwater of 20 ± 2 °C). As mentioned in the Materials and Methods section, data from these studies (Adams et al, 2007; Booij et al, 2003; Lee et al, 2014; Perron et al, 2009; Zhu et al, 2015) were excluded from the present database. As a result, the present database contains K PE‐w values from 10 studies for PAHs (Supporting Information, Table S3A) and from 4 studies for PCBs (Supporting Information, Table S3B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After all, polymer–water partitioning is dependent on temperature (Booij et al, 2003; Jonker et al, 2015; Muijs & Jonker, 2009) and salinity (Jonker & Muijs, 2010; Jonker et al, 2015), and coefficients determined at different temperatures or salinities should therefore not be pooled. Thus K PE‐w and K PDMS‐w values resulting from seawater exposures (Lee et al, 2014; Perron et al, 2009; Reitsma et al, 2013; Zeng et al, 2005) or experiments performed at lower (Booij et al, 2003; Reitsma et al, 2013) or higher temperatures (Adams et al, 2007; Booij et al, 2003; Eganhouse, 2016; Grant et al, 2016; Hsieh et al, 2011; Lee et al, 2014; Mayer et al, 2000; Paschke & Popp, 2003; Yang et al, 2007; Zhu et al, 2015) were excluded from the database. The temperature range of 20 ± 2 °C was selected because it matches with the exposure temperature applied in the majority of (high‐quality) literature studies and the present study, as well as with the exposure temperature defined in the recently published passive sampling standard protocol (Jonker et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation