2015
DOI: 10.3390/jlpea5020130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Low Power Bitcell Design Featuring Inherent SEU Prevention and Self Correction Capabilities

Abstract: The pursuit of continuous scaling of electronic devices in the semiconductor industry has led to two unintended but significant outcomes: a rapid increase in susceptibility to radiation induced errors, and an overall rise in power consumption. Operating under low voltage to reduce power only aggravates radiation related reliability issues. The proposed "SEU Hardening Incorporating Extreme Low Power Bitcell Design" (SHIELD) addresses these two major concerns simultaneously. It is based on the concept of gating … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using dual node feedback control provides full SEU fault immunity, however, cannot fully tolerate multiple node upsets because of negative effects of charge sharing induced by particle strikes [9], [11]. Furthermore, the area overhead, power consumption and delay are high compared to the conventional 6T SRAM cell [10], [13], [12]. Especially its high area overhead restricts the applicability where area efficiency is essential [9].…”
Section: ) Previous Cell Designs That Cannot Provide Seu Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using dual node feedback control provides full SEU fault immunity, however, cannot fully tolerate multiple node upsets because of negative effects of charge sharing induced by particle strikes [9], [11]. Furthermore, the area overhead, power consumption and delay are high compared to the conventional 6T SRAM cell [10], [13], [12]. Especially its high area overhead restricts the applicability where area efficiency is essential [9].…”
Section: ) Previous Cell Designs That Cannot Provide Seu Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, various differential (dual) and single bitline radiation hardened SRAM cells have been published by researchers which can tolerate SNUs and MNUs, in typical types (based on basic structure in radiation hardened memory cells such as dual interlocked storage cell (DICE), 11 Quatro, 12 ), terrestrial (low-orbit) and aerospace (highorbit) applications using RHDB and layout approaches. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] In the literature, 19,20 some asymmetrical hardened SRAM cells, where some symmetrical bitline hardened SRAM cells in literatures, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] are proposed. Also, single bitline (or single-ended) hardened SRAM cells based on Muller C-elements are proposed in referances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, single bitline (or single-ended) hardened SRAM cells based on Muller C-elements are proposed in referances. 22,23 In the literature, 24,25 based on RHBD combined with a layout-level technique, the radiation hardening memory cells with self-recover approach from any SNU, any double-adjacent-node upsets (DANUs) and partial double-separated-node upsets (DSNUs) has been proposed. However, SRAM structures based on RHBD still have disadvantages, which are as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations