2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2022.107111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel laser-based duffing oscillator system to identify weak ultrasonic guided wave signals related to rail defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, differential processing By comparing the signal for a healthy rail with that for a crack in the bottom of the rail for the same path, the interaction between the crack and the UGW can be visually highlighted, which is beneficial for signal analysis. Therefore, differential processing was performed for all received UGW signals, and the formula is shown in Equation (9). By comparing the 16 path signals of transverse cracks with different depths, it was found that when the depth of the cracks is small, the PZT-5A on the side of the rail bottom could better characterise the damage state than the one on the upper surface of the rail bottom.…”
Section: Design Of Piezoelectric Sensor Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, differential processing By comparing the signal for a healthy rail with that for a crack in the bottom of the rail for the same path, the interaction between the crack and the UGW can be visually highlighted, which is beneficial for signal analysis. Therefore, differential processing was performed for all received UGW signals, and the formula is shown in Equation (9). By comparing the 16 path signals of transverse cracks with different depths, it was found that when the depth of the cracks is small, the PZT-5A on the side of the rail bottom could better characterise the damage state than the one on the upper surface of the rail bottom.…”
Section: Design Of Piezoelectric Sensor Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, compared with the NDT method, the monitoring method is more suitable for the At present, non-destructive testing (NDT) technology is usually used for detecting rail damage. Commonly used NDT technologies include visual inspection, magnetic induction, eddy current, photothermal, ultrasonic, etc., [6][7][8][9][10][11]. However, existing NDT methods mainly focus on the inspection of the rail head and rail web, and little research has been conducted on the detection of rail bottom defects, especially for the edge of the rail bottom that is far away from the rail web [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu [28] carried out simulation and experimental studies on the UGW detection of pipeline defects using the maximum Lyapunov exponent and the Lyapunov fractional dimensions as phase determination indexes, respectively. Ng [29] identified hole defects in rails using the maximum Lyapunov exponent of the Duffing equation. Additionally, Cheng [30] developed a pipeline damage detection method based on the double Duffing equation for detecting weak defect echo signals caused by pipeline defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 With the development of non-contact detection technology, manual visual inspection is gradually being replaced. 3 The traditional non-contact inspection methods include eddy current detection, 4 ultrasonic guided wave detection, 5 and infrared detection. 6 However, these methods have limitations, such as being costly, complex, and have limited visual feedback during the defect identification process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%