2021
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2021.3086422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Integer Linear Programming Formulation for Job-Shop Scheduling Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gist of the tightening is to delineate facets of the convex hull; if successful, then the combinatorial problem reduces to a much easier-to-solve LP problem; even if a problem is "partially" tightened, the CPU time is greatly reduced (Yan et al 2018(Yan et al , 2021. One of the most recent advancements to reduce the number of decision variables and constraints, compared to previous ILP formulation, is proven to be tighter compared to previous formulations (Liu et al 2021): only the beginning times of operations are decision variables thereby reducing the number of decision variables and constraints compared to those within the previous formulations. Since the formulation has few decision variables and constraints, for a problem instance from (Hoitomt et al 1993), the formulation leads to several orders of magnitude improvement over previously-used approaches in terms of CPU time and to optimality of solution obtained (from 3,600 s and 3.72% gap down to 3.31 s and 0% gap) when solved by using standard B&C (Liu et al 2021).…”
Section: Supply Chain Management Downstream Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The gist of the tightening is to delineate facets of the convex hull; if successful, then the combinatorial problem reduces to a much easier-to-solve LP problem; even if a problem is "partially" tightened, the CPU time is greatly reduced (Yan et al 2018(Yan et al , 2021. One of the most recent advancements to reduce the number of decision variables and constraints, compared to previous ILP formulation, is proven to be tighter compared to previous formulations (Liu et al 2021): only the beginning times of operations are decision variables thereby reducing the number of decision variables and constraints compared to those within the previous formulations. Since the formulation has few decision variables and constraints, for a problem instance from (Hoitomt et al 1993), the formulation leads to several orders of magnitude improvement over previously-used approaches in terms of CPU time and to optimality of solution obtained (from 3,600 s and 3.72% gap down to 3.31 s and 0% gap) when solved by using standard B&C (Liu et al 2021).…”
Section: Supply Chain Management Downstream Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supported by the work "Surrogate" Lagrangian Relaxation (SLR) (Bragin et al 2015) whereby the difficulties of the sub-gradient method (such as zigzagging of multipliers and high computational effort) were overcome, the JSS problem was formulated as an MILP problem and efficiently solved by using the SLR method (Yan et al 2018). To further improve computational efficiency, supported by the work of Bragin et al (2019) whereby convergence of SLR was improved by using two-segment absolutevalue penalties for constraint violations, the JSS problem (as mentioned before) was formulated as a tighter MILP problem and the resulting problem was solved by using a version of the SLR method with three-segment penalties for faster convergence (Liu et al 2021).…”
Section: Supply Chain Management Downstream Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where S is the set of all part-operation pairs. Range [li,j, ui,j] contains all eligible beginning times, and can be derived based on part arrival times ai, operation processing times {pi,j}, and T following ( 9) and ( 10) of [7].…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Surrogate Lagrangian Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupling machine capacity (Constraints ( 7) of [7]) Decision variables of different parts are coupled by machine capacity constraints, i.e., the number of "active" operations (i.e., being processed) on a machine group at each time slot cannot exceed the capacity of that machine group. To formulate these constraints based on {bi,j,t}, a fact is novelly exploited that if operation (i, j) is processing on time slot t, then it must begin within [t-pi,j+1].…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Surrogate Lagrangian Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%