2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel in vivo procedure for volumetric flow measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To estimatec hÀg , mean coronary flow is needed. Many studies have validated the use of Doppler flow wire to measureQ with reasonable accuracy both in vivo and in vitro, especially at hyperemia (Doriot et al, 2000;Doucette et al, 1992;Jenni et al, 2000Jenni et al, , 2004Webb et al, 2005). Recently, a single wire with pressure and Doppler flow sensor has been used for simultaneous measurement of Dp andQ (Siebes et al, 2004).…”
Section: Viscous Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimatec hÀg , mean coronary flow is needed. Many studies have validated the use of Doppler flow wire to measureQ with reasonable accuracy both in vivo and in vitro, especially at hyperemia (Doriot et al, 2000;Doucette et al, 1992;Jenni et al, 2000Jenni et al, , 2004Webb et al, 2005). Recently, a single wire with pressure and Doppler flow sensor has been used for simultaneous measurement of Dp andQ (Siebes et al, 2004).…”
Section: Viscous Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At any instant along the cardiac cycle, the shape of the spatial velocity profile is not known a priori (see, e.g., [23] and [24]). Indeed, it is known that, despite the validity of the cylindrical symmetry hypothesis, the shape of the velocity profile is influenced by many factors, including pulsatility, viscosity, and diameter in vascular districts (see [33], [48], and [56]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth stressing that the a priori assumption of spatial velocity profile (usually a parabolic one) required by the single-point Doppler method introduces a bias in any flow rate estimate with potentially remarkable consequences. For what concerns the mean flow rate, even if some authors supported using a parabolic velocity profile (see [6,29]), in more recent years this has been considered too simplistic and misleading (see [43,21,22]). The limitations obtained by estimating the peak flow rate by using a parabolic velocity profile have been pointed out in [40] where a mathematically more sophisticated approach has been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%