2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel in silico scale-up approach for hot melt extrusion processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an important result: although higher SMEC values generally result in higher API degradations, SMEC does not seem to be a good descriptor of the process and product quality equivalence. Therefore, it is not advisable to use it for scale-up, as suggested by many authors and discussed in one of our previous papers ( Matić et al 2019 ). Moreover, even in case C with the same barrel temperature profile (profile I), the resulting SMEC values differ by a factor of two while the API degradation is similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is an important result: although higher SMEC values generally result in higher API degradations, SMEC does not seem to be a good descriptor of the process and product quality equivalence. Therefore, it is not advisable to use it for scale-up, as suggested by many authors and discussed in one of our previous papers ( Matić et al 2019 ). Moreover, even in case C with the same barrel temperature profile (profile I), the resulting SMEC values differ by a factor of two while the API degradation is similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As part of the process control and simulation validation efforts, the process torque, SMEC and RTD were captured, analyzed and compared to the values obtained in the 1D HME simulations. A detailed analysis can provide valuable insights into the process, showing the effect of the process settings on the filling degree, the melt temperature and the pressure profile (see our earlier work ( Matić et al 2019 )). A comparison between the experimental and in silico values is important for validating the simulations, including the A1 and A2 values used to parametrize the screws, and the parametrization of the formulation obtained via the material's measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the processed formulations are binary mixtures, a screw configuration that does not introduce extensive amount of shear was selected ( Figure 1 a). The arrangement and choice of the kneading blocks guaranteed a soft back-conveying section with enhanced distributive mixing capabilities, allowing a sufficient local residence time for melting the formulations [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. Consequently, any potential API agglomerate that may have formed in the hopper breaks up, which guarantees a uniform API distribution in the polymer matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, any potential API agglomerate that may have formed in the hopper breaks up, which guarantees a uniform API distribution in the polymer matrix. In addition, in order to prevent any thermal degradation, two consecutive mixing elements were chosen to increase distributive mixing without introducing high viscous dissipation [ 22 , 38 , 40 ]. All open barrels for side/top feeding (barrel 4 and 5 in Figure 1 a) or de-gassing (barrel 6 and 9 in Figure 1 a) remained closed by closing inserts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation