2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.09.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel group decision making method with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations for RFID technology selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A prominent characteristic of IFS is that it assigns to each element a membership degree and a non-membership degree, and thus, it is more powerful to deal with uncertainty and vagueness in real applications than fuzzy set which is only assigns to each element a membership degree (Hsieh and Chan, 2016). The IFS has received more and more attention since its appearance (Xu, 2007;Yu, 2015;Boran and Akay, 2014;Wan, Wang and Dong, 2016;Zeng and Chen, 2015;Zeng and Xiao, 2016;Zeng, Su and Zhang, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prominent characteristic of IFS is that it assigns to each element a membership degree and a non-membership degree, and thus, it is more powerful to deal with uncertainty and vagueness in real applications than fuzzy set which is only assigns to each element a membership degree (Hsieh and Chan, 2016). The IFS has received more and more attention since its appearance (Xu, 2007;Yu, 2015;Boran and Akay, 2014;Wan, Wang and Dong, 2016;Zeng and Chen, 2015;Zeng and Xiao, 2016;Zeng, Su and Zhang, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,27 Thus, numerous studies have focused on the development of the compromising methods and techniques by combining the proximity to the positiveideal solution and the remoteness from the negative-ideal solution (e.g., Refs. 26,[28][29][30][31][32][33]. Because the employment of the positive-ideal and negative-ideal solutions can facilitate the rationale underlying anchored judgments in human subjective decisionmaking processes, this paper proposes a similar concept of the closeness index with the positive-ideal and negative-ideal IVPF values and attempts to incorporate this concept into the proposed IVPF outranking method.…”
Section: A Closeness Index With Ideal Ivpf Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2014b; Li and Nan 2009; Wan et al. 2016a; Xu 2007a, b; Yu 2015a). In the field of MCDM, the primary objective is of the information aggregation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2016; Robinson and Amirtharaj 2015; Wan and Dong 2015; Wan et al. 2016a, b; Wang and Liu 2011; Xu and Yager 2006; Yu 2013a, b, 2015b; Yu and Shi 2015; Zhou et al. 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%