2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1067/7/072008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel field cage design for the CPS IPM and systematic errors in beam size and emittance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measured profiles are normalized to unit integral. 4. Measured profile bins are set to zero for values smaller than 5% of the peak value.…”
Section: Hyper-parameter Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Measured profiles are normalized to unit integral. 4. Measured profile bins are set to zero for values smaller than 5% of the peak value.…”
Section: Hyper-parameter Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their lower mass, electrons are removed much faster from the influence of bunch fields, however the effect of these fields on their trajectories is proportionally larger. Usually ion-based devices are preferred due to simpler assembly (no need of ion-trapping [4]), smaller impact of fringe fields of neighbouring magnets and lack of background signal from electrons generated from various other sources [5]. However the influence of beam fields plays a major role for high-brightness beams and thus electron-based IPMs are preferred over ion-based devices, mainly because the electron movement can be easily confined to small gyroradius by applying external magnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation