2012
DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2012.716167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel experimental approach to determine the absolute grain boundary energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using the Scherrer equation, the average crystallite size was found to be 34 nm in the as-deposited alloy and increased to 61 nm after annealing. An enthalpy change of À0.11 kJ/mol was evaluated by employing experimental values of grain boundary energy in zinc [9]. This rough calculation shows that grain growth represents a small part of the total enthalpy change (À4.2 kJ/mol).…”
Section: Xrd and Dsc Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the Scherrer equation, the average crystallite size was found to be 34 nm in the as-deposited alloy and increased to 61 nm after annealing. An enthalpy change of À0.11 kJ/mol was evaluated by employing experimental values of grain boundary energy in zinc [9]. This rough calculation shows that grain growth represents a small part of the total enthalpy change (À4.2 kJ/mol).…”
Section: Xrd and Dsc Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A magnetic field driving force was used to evaluate the effect of anisotropic GB energy on GB migration in a bicrystal (119). The special geometry included notches on the sample surface that pinned the boundary and prevented it from moving freely.…”
Section: Bicrystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is already well known that both grain boundary energy and mobility depend on misorientation between adjacent grains and, for a given grain misorientation, on inclination of the boundary plane [12]. A dependence of grain boundary energy on inclination can result in the formation of low energy grain boundary facets [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54], which in turn can substantially affect grain boundary motion [55][56][57][58][59] and, therefore, be essential for processes of microstructure evolution in polycrystals, such as recrystallization, grain growth and sintering [60][61][62][63][64]. Most of reported observations of grain boundary faceting relate to high angle boundaries with misorientations close to low Σ CSL orientation relationships [47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Effect Of Grain Boundary Character On Motion and Faceting Of...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the reduced mobility of a curved 75° 101 0 tilt boundary was ° =1.1×10 -8 m 2 /s [110]. In experiments with zinc bicrystals the grain boundary energy was estimated to be ≅ 0.35 J/m 2 [54]. Accordingly, the absolute boundary mobility amounts to ° ≅ 3.1×10 -8 m 4 /J⋅s, which is in a good agreement with the result obtained for a magnetically driven 101 0 tilt boundary with similar misorientation (76.0°) at 400°C, °= 5.8×10 -8 m 4 /J⋅s.…”
Section: Absolute Grain Boundary Mobility Measured On Bi and Zn Bicry...mentioning
confidence: 99%