2018
DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/ply070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel dendroecological method finds a non-linear relationship between elevation and seasonal growth continuity on an island with trade wind-influenced water availability

Abstract: Climatic seasonality drives ecosystem processes (e.g. productivity) and influences plant species distribution. However, it is poorly understood how different aspects of seasonality (especially regarding temperature and precipitation) affect growth continuity of trees in climates with low seasonality because seasonality is often only crudely measured. On islands, exceptionally wide elevational species distribution ranges allow the use of tree rings to identify how growth continuity and climate–growth relationsh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistics of the tree-ring chronologies for the four studied species were within the common range of variation of MS (0.25-0.74), and even surpassed the common variation range of r xy (0.15-0.60) and EPS (0.27-0.94) found in tropical and subtropical tree-ring chronologies (Locoselli et al, 2013;Mendivelso et al, 2014;López and Villalba, 2016;Pagotto et al, 2017;Islam et al, 2018;Blagitz et al, 2019;Fontana et al, 2019;Marcelo-Peña et al, 2019). Statistics of the studied tree-ring chronologies were also similar than those from the conifers Juniperus brevifolia and Pinus canariensis in Azores and the Canaries, respectively (Rozas et al, 2013;Weigel et al, 2018;Pavão et al, 2022). These evidences indicate that ring width series from laurel forests tree species have analogous dendrochronological potential than Macaronesian conifers and tree species from tropical and subtropical forests worldwide.…”
Section: Dendrochronological Potential and Climate Sensitivitysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The statistics of the tree-ring chronologies for the four studied species were within the common range of variation of MS (0.25-0.74), and even surpassed the common variation range of r xy (0.15-0.60) and EPS (0.27-0.94) found in tropical and subtropical tree-ring chronologies (Locoselli et al, 2013;Mendivelso et al, 2014;López and Villalba, 2016;Pagotto et al, 2017;Islam et al, 2018;Blagitz et al, 2019;Fontana et al, 2019;Marcelo-Peña et al, 2019). Statistics of the studied tree-ring chronologies were also similar than those from the conifers Juniperus brevifolia and Pinus canariensis in Azores and the Canaries, respectively (Rozas et al, 2013;Weigel et al, 2018;Pavão et al, 2022). These evidences indicate that ring width series from laurel forests tree species have analogous dendrochronological potential than Macaronesian conifers and tree species from tropical and subtropical forests worldwide.…”
Section: Dendrochronological Potential and Climate Sensitivitysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…comprise a substantial proportion of species diversity (del Arco‐Aguilar et al., 2010). Under such favourable growing conditions with very little seasonality in temperature and precipitation (Weigel et al., 2018), short‐lived species such as therophytes and low stature species (geophytes and hemicryptophytes but also dwarf shrub chamaephytes) are outcompeted by tall‐growing woody species (trees, large shrubs) that produce a dense and dark canopy (Delgado et al, 2007). Merely as a result of their large structures, phanerophytes have a competitive advantage over other plant life‐forms, indicating a climate‐driven selection of tall‐growing plant life‐forms under humid and mild conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter most likely will affect the response of tree growth to climate variability, but the related evidence is still insufficient and contradictory (Andrews et al, 2020; Steckel et al, 2020). Since inter‐annual growth variation and growth synchrony among co‐occurring trees should theoretically increase toward more stressful and variable environments (Fritts, 1966; Shestakova et al, 2016; Weigel, Irl, et al, 2018), we expected that both growth variation and synchrony are higher at the dry end of the studied precipitation gradient and have increased with the recent warming since about the 1980s. We thus hypothesize that (i) the radial growth rate of beech has declined since about 1980, with more pronounced reductions occurring at drier sites, (ii) inter‐annual growth fluctuation and within‐stand growth synchrony have increased since the 1980s and both are larger at drier sites, and (iii) variables related to climatic drought in summer have a larger impact on growth and drought sensitivity than soil and stand structural factors including competition intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%