2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2018.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel CRDT-based synchronization method for real-time collaborative CAD systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The original paper on CRDTs [16] actually assumes that all replicas are in a correct state when performing updates, and does not specify how to ensure this for replicas that have not started with the same initial state. Follow-up papers on CRDTs targeting systems that are typically used in dynamic environments, such as for use in collaborative tools, generally rely on a centralised approach with a membership protocol [12,13]. To the best of our knowledge this is the first paper to describe a join model for CRDTs, in particular, for a dynamic environment.…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original paper on CRDTs [16] actually assumes that all replicas are in a correct state when performing updates, and does not specify how to ensure this for replicas that have not started with the same initial state. Follow-up papers on CRDTs targeting systems that are typically used in dynamic environments, such as for use in collaborative tools, generally rely on a centralised approach with a membership protocol [12,13]. To the best of our knowledge this is the first paper to describe a join model for CRDTs, in particular, for a dynamic environment.…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the simulation results show that the proposed integration algorithm of planning and scheduling is competitive in global optimization and practicality. In future work, we will try to extend the proposed idea to solve other complex problems in science and engineering (Hu et al, 2003; Kang et al, 2018; Lv et al, 2018; Wu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%