2018
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Method for One-Piece Removable Partial Denture and Evaluation of Fit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the compatibility of the digital RSMs fabricated in this study is better than that of traditional types, largely because the conventional fabrication of RSMs is overly complex in terms of model construction; difficulties include the polymerization shrinkage of the self-curing resin, and the grinding and polishing of the RSM, which are prone to errors. Ye et al [42] found that the space under a cast metal large connecter was 131.1 ± 87.1 μm (7.5-353.0 μm), while that under a PEEK large connecter was 52.8 ± 44.6 μm (0.5-177.4 μm). In this study, the mean space of the PEEK and conventional RMSs were 44.32 ± 1.75 μm and 137.36 ± 18.63 μm, respectively, and their values were all smaller than the above research results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the compatibility of the digital RSMs fabricated in this study is better than that of traditional types, largely because the conventional fabrication of RSMs is overly complex in terms of model construction; difficulties include the polymerization shrinkage of the self-curing resin, and the grinding and polishing of the RSM, which are prone to errors. Ye et al [42] found that the space under a cast metal large connecter was 131.1 ± 87.1 μm (7.5-353.0 μm), while that under a PEEK large connecter was 52.8 ± 44.6 μm (0.5-177.4 μm). In this study, the mean space of the PEEK and conventional RMSs were 44.32 ± 1.75 μm and 137.36 ± 18.63 μm, respectively, and their values were all smaller than the above research results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 23 Furthermore, PEEK has also been employed in the digital manufacture of removable partial dentures. 24,25 Several previous studies have investigated the two-body wear rate and three-body abrasion of PEEK, 26,27 and they concluded that PEEK performed better resistance. However, clinical research on the wear resistance of PEEK materials has not yet been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This material is thought to possess optimal physical properties that match with those of the tissues it is intended to replace (human bone, enamel, and dentin). Ye et al 139 reported on a preliminary laboratory trial incorporating a novel CAD-CAM process to produce 1piece RPDs fabricated by using PEEK. Fit of the PEEK RPDs was assessed on a standardized model and compared with the fit of traditional cast metal framework RPDs.…”
Section: Conventional Removable Partial Prosthodonticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vitro fit of prostheses so manufactured appears to be better than that of traditional metal framework RPDs with acrylic resin bases and denture teeth. Ye et al 139 encouraged further investigation into the mechanical properties and long-term performance of PEEK in this novel application.…”
Section: Conventional Removable Partial Prosthodonticsmentioning
confidence: 99%