2022
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.35029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel classification of bone graft materials

Abstract: Over the past few decades, the field of biomaterials concerning bone tissue engineering has gained a significant amount of interest. This has led to new biomaterials to be used as bone substitute materials. Despite the rapid increase in the types and forms of bone substitutes, a comprehensive classification encompassing all types of bone graft materials that have so far been developed and evaluated is lacking. Therefore, this review aims to integrate and bring together the published data on bone substitutes wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 287 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to their source, a general classification of bone substitutes includes autografts obtained from the patients themselves, xenografts derived from animal sources, and allografts obtained from donors of the same species [ 16 ]. The autologous bone grafts, which are characterized by intrinsic osteoconductive and osteoinductive features, are still considered as the gold standard [ 8 , 10 , 17 ], although some limitations are associated to limited availability sources and damages at donor sites such as morbidity, inflammation, increased risk of infections and even rejection [ 10 , 11 , 18 ].…”
Section: Bone Tissue Engineering: Challenging Multidisciplinary Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to their source, a general classification of bone substitutes includes autografts obtained from the patients themselves, xenografts derived from animal sources, and allografts obtained from donors of the same species [ 16 ]. The autologous bone grafts, which are characterized by intrinsic osteoconductive and osteoinductive features, are still considered as the gold standard [ 8 , 10 , 17 ], although some limitations are associated to limited availability sources and damages at donor sites such as morbidity, inflammation, increased risk of infections and even rejection [ 10 , 11 , 18 ].…”
Section: Bone Tissue Engineering: Challenging Multidisciplinary Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 2.2 million bone graft procedures are performed annually worldwide to repair bone defects in orthopedics, neurosurgery, and dentistry (Giannoudis et al, 2005). The search for new bone substitutes like autologous graft materials has been advancing as alternatives to bone repair (Wickramasinghe et al, 2022) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Musculoskeletal injuries represent US$ 56 billion each year, of which US$ 21 billion goes to fracture treatment, second only to heart disease [2] . Although advances in bone injuries management have improved survival rates, subsequent complications remain challenging, requiring further research with alternative treatments through new molecules that act on bone repair [3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%