2015
DOI: 10.1587/elex.12.20150102
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel cascade control replica-bitline delay technique for reducing timing process-variation of SRAM sense amplifier

Abstract: A novel cascade control replica bitline delay (CCRBD) technique has been proposed to reduce timing process-variation of SRAM sense amplifier in this brief. The main idea of this technique is that both replica bitlines (RBLs) are utilized, and one is cascade controlled by the other. Simulation results show that the timing process-variation of this technique decreases by 41.83% compared with conventional strategy. Simultaneously, the cycle time is also reduced by 19% at the supply voltage of 800 mV in TSMC 65 nm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, the standard deviation of SAE timing generated by pipelined circuit obtains 69.45% improvement compared with that generated by conventional circuit, owing to 235.89 ps reduction. Generally, the delay time of the SAE timing occupies about half of the cycle time [5,6,7,9,10]; hence, the conventional cycle time is 10.52 ns (ð6:26 À 1Þ ns  2). According to [5,6,7,9,10], three-sigma (3) variation existing is assumed for the SAE timing margin; thus, the SAE timing margin is reduced from 2.038 ns (3  2) to 0.623 ns by applying the proposed circuit.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As can be seen, the standard deviation of SAE timing generated by pipelined circuit obtains 69.45% improvement compared with that generated by conventional circuit, owing to 235.89 ps reduction. Generally, the delay time of the SAE timing occupies about half of the cycle time [5,6,7,9,10]; hence, the conventional cycle time is 10.52 ns (ð6:26 À 1Þ ns  2). According to [5,6,7,9,10], three-sigma (3) variation existing is assumed for the SAE timing margin; thus, the SAE timing margin is reduced from 2.038 ns (3  2) to 0.623 ns by applying the proposed circuit.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According [7,8], the mean value and the standard deviation of the conventional SAE timing delay are described as Conv and Conv , respectively.…”
Section: Proposed Pipelined Rbl Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations