2019
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201802115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Blood‐Based Colorectal Cancer Diagnostic Technology Using Electrical Detection of Colon Cancer Secreted Protein‐2

Abstract: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second‐leading cause of cancer‐related mortality worldwide, which may be effectively reduced by early screening. Colon cancer secreted protein‐2 (CCSP‐2) is a promising blood marker for CRC. An electric‐field effect colorectal sensor (E‐FECS), an ion‐sensitive field‐effect transistor under dual gate operation with nanostructure is developed, to quantify CCSP‐2 directly from patient blood samples. The sensing performance of the E‐FECS is verified in 7 controls and 7 CRC samples, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether the expression level of metabolism-related genes can be used as a prognostic maker is a vital topic of research. Our colorectal cancer prognostic model based on six metabolism-related genes was found to be of value and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year risk scores and the AUC values of ROC were consistent with previous reports ( Jeun et al, 2019 ; Park et al, 2009 ; Peng et al, 2019 ; Sun et al, 2019 ). Prognoses were classified as high- and low-risk and the six metabolic genes we screened may be ideal prognostic markers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Whether the expression level of metabolism-related genes can be used as a prognostic maker is a vital topic of research. Our colorectal cancer prognostic model based on six metabolism-related genes was found to be of value and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year risk scores and the AUC values of ROC were consistent with previous reports ( Jeun et al, 2019 ; Park et al, 2009 ; Peng et al, 2019 ; Sun et al, 2019 ). Prognoses were classified as high- and low-risk and the six metabolic genes we screened may be ideal prognostic markers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The TCGA cohort was used as the training group. ROC curve analysis showed that the nine gene markers had a better diagnostic ability and could select CRC patients with poor prognosis and AUC values of ROC, which was consistent with previous reports ( Jeun et al, 2019 ). Moreover, the validation group results (GEO cohorts) were consistent with the results from the training group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this study, our prognosis model is considered to be valuable. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year AUC value of ROC was 0.792, 0.744, and 0.797, respectively, which was more accurate than previous reports (30,31). The immune genes may be ideal prognostic markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%