“…To improve the ability to classify and segment the lumen in difficult regions, such as stented arteries and bifurcations, machine learning approaches show significant potential. Yang et al, compared the performance of six classifiers (RF, SVM, J48, Bagging, Naïve Bayes and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) [ 81 , 82 , 83 ]) in difficult or irregular regions [ 84 ]. By identifying and classifying 92 features from 54 patients and 14,207 images (1857 images denoted as irregular) through supervised learning and a partition-membership filtering method, the RF classifier produced the best overall accuracy compared to the other five classifiers: RF 98.2%, SVM 98.1%, J48 97.3%, Bagging 96.6%, Naïve Bayes 88.8%, AdaBoost 88.7%.…”