2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Approach to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in Care Home Residents: The GET READY Study Utilising Service-Learning and Co-Creation

Abstract: The GET READY study aimed to integrate service-learning methodology into University degrees by offering students individual service opportunities with residential care homes, to co-create the best suited intervention to reduce the sedentary behaviour (SB) of residents throughout the day, with researchers, end-users, care staff, family members and policymakers. Eight workshops with care home residents and four workshops with care staff, relatives and policymakers, led by undergraduate students, were audiotaped,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that this challenge is compounded by aging attitudes, lack of motivation, social norms, and safety concerns, which all promote sitting. This is consistent with the findings of Gine-Garriga et al [22], who also reported that older adults in residential care spoke of a highly sedentary daily routine with little encouragement to move. The sedentary nature of these residences is supported by evidence that older adults in assisted living accumulate markedly less time standing and walking compared to older adults who live independently [20,21], and studies have shown a rapid decline in function among assisted living residents [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We found that this challenge is compounded by aging attitudes, lack of motivation, social norms, and safety concerns, which all promote sitting. This is consistent with the findings of Gine-Garriga et al [22], who also reported that older adults in residential care spoke of a highly sedentary daily routine with little encouragement to move. The sedentary nature of these residences is supported by evidence that older adults in assisted living accumulate markedly less time standing and walking compared to older adults who live independently [20,21], and studies have shown a rapid decline in function among assisted living residents [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, while Chastin et al [16] found that activities of daily living and household chores were a key motive for reducing sedentary time in community dwelling older adults, in assisted living the absence of domestic chores was identified as a barrier. To our knowledge, only one other study has examined barriers or motivators to reducing sedentary time within an assisted living environment [22] although the results focused more on the benefits of being physically active or exercising rather than the benefits of breaking up prolonged sitting. Participants in that study [22] offered suggestions that were consistent with our findings, including: support from family and staff; giving residents a purposeful reason to move (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An earlier stage of the GET READY project integrated a service-learning methodology into physical therapy and sport sciences university degrees by offering students individual service opportunities with residential care homes. They were tasked to co-create the best suited intervention to reduce the SB of residents and enhance movement throughout the day, together with researchers, end-users, care staff members, family members, and policymakers [38]. In the current stage of the GET READY project, we conducted a pilot two-armed pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial with baseline and end-of-intervention assessments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, within a pilot two-armed pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial (RCT), we aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of an intervention to reduce SB and enhance PA, which was previously co-created with care home residents, staff, family members, and policymakers [38]. Our secondary aim was to assess the preliminary effects of the intervention to reduce SB and improve health-related outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%