2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel approach for UV-patterning with binary polymer brushes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S4), we believed that our results had corroborated well with previous literature on hydrophobic surfaces, especially when our XPS had also revealed a mixture of both CH 3 and surface OH (a result of steric hindrance on Si (111) surfaces). As many previous reports on using mixed SAM had often relied on large polymeric system to obtain similar wettability profile (~60-80°) as well as cell/protein repellency effect [81][82][83] , what that had set our work apart is the fact that grafting of short cyclic monolayer is already sufficient to obtain similar findings. Interestingly, while 1,7 octadiyne surfaces in our work had also shown similar hydrophobicity profiling, we did not observe high anti-biofouling effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…S4), we believed that our results had corroborated well with previous literature on hydrophobic surfaces, especially when our XPS had also revealed a mixture of both CH 3 and surface OH (a result of steric hindrance on Si (111) surfaces). As many previous reports on using mixed SAM had often relied on large polymeric system to obtain similar wettability profile (~60-80°) as well as cell/protein repellency effect [81][82][83] , what that had set our work apart is the fact that grafting of short cyclic monolayer is already sufficient to obtain similar findings. Interestingly, while 1,7 octadiyne surfaces in our work had also shown similar hydrophobicity profiling, we did not observe high anti-biofouling effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is important to note that we primarily focus on planar substrates; MPBs on curved surfaces and particles have been reviewed previously and provide promising platforms for materials that can be selectively shuttled between phases in multi-component mixtures [55]. Note that there are also so-called "binary" or "ternary" polymer brushes, patterned manually in nanometer-or micron-scales (e.g., using a photomask) on a surface [56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64]. We do not consider these as "binary or ternary mixed polymer brushes" here, since their tethered ends are not inherently mixed on a molecular level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the different properties (e.g., different biocompatibility, molecular recognition, and electron conductivity) arranged on a single surface, the patterned polymer brushes allow applications in, e.g., bio-microarray detection, molecular recognition analytical devices, and microelectronic devices. , Surface-initiated living radical polymerization has been used to prepare such patterned polymer brushes from prepatterned initiators. ,,, Several advanced techniques, such as electron-beam lithography, , interference laser lithography, , scanning-probe lithography, and microcontact printing, , have successfully been used to prepare the prepatterned initiators with controlled surface densities. Not only the high-energy beam and laser but also low-energy UV light (≤254 nm), plasma, and UV/ozone were exploited to degrade alkyl bromide surface-initiators of atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). However, the UV degradation of the alkyl bromides is time-consuming (≥3.5 h), limiting its extensive use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%