2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel alternate feeding mode for semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with chicken manure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TAN concentrations at which severe inhibition occurred were considerably higher than those found in a study on mesophilic mono-digestion of CM: it was reported that ammonia inhibition occurred at approximately 2.7 g TAN L -1 while methane production declined by 90% at 3.5 g TAN L -1 , at pH values of approximately 7.7 (Wang et al, 2014). According to Niu et al (2013), biogas production of 0.35 to 0.40 L g -1 VS was achieved when the TAN concentration was lower than 5 g N L -1 in the continuous mesophilic digestion of CM.…”
Section: Biogas Productionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The TAN concentrations at which severe inhibition occurred were considerably higher than those found in a study on mesophilic mono-digestion of CM: it was reported that ammonia inhibition occurred at approximately 2.7 g TAN L -1 while methane production declined by 90% at 3.5 g TAN L -1 , at pH values of approximately 7.7 (Wang et al, 2014). According to Niu et al (2013), biogas production of 0.35 to 0.40 L g -1 VS was achieved when the TAN concentration was lower than 5 g N L -1 in the continuous mesophilic digestion of CM.…”
Section: Biogas Productionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Chicken manure (CM) is a waste feedstock that has a high recoverable energy potential as it is easily degradable in an AD system (Wang et al, 2014). This material has a high protein content, however, which releases ammonia when hydrolysed and although this can increase the buffering capacity of the AD process, the overall C/N ratio is only 5 to 10 (Yangin- Gomec & Ozturk, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ammonia removal from the chicken manure digestate by physical methods and recirculation of the digestate to the digestor resulted in a biogas yield of 0.39 L/g VS in a mesophilic CSTR operated with HRT of 12e15 days and OLR of 5.3 g VS/L$d (34). Wang et al (35) stated that alternate feeding mode of food waste and chicken manure in a sequence of food waste/food waste/ chicken manure, respectively, for every three days, ended up with a methane production rate of 508 mL/g VS at an HRT of 35 days and OLR of 2.5 g VS/L$d. There are several studies on biogas production in two stage systems having one or both reactors working at mesophilic or thermophilic conditions in which different kind of substrates used at varying OLRs and HRTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The output and composition of biogas obtained from chicken manure or its mixes with other organic waste have been studied by many scientists, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] but the experimental research based on the use of additives is rather limited. Therefore, to investigate this problem, a biochar additive (10% by mass of the dry load) (experiment B) was used for obtaining an organic load.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%