2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel algorithm for land use and land cover classification using RADARSAT-2 polarimetric SAR data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
130
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
130
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on physical assumptions, polarimetric decomposition procedures aim to separate these different backscatter types [54,55]. As dual-pol SAR imagery was available for this study, the H/α decomposition proposed by Cloude and Pottier [40] was applied.…”
Section: Polarimetric Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on physical assumptions, polarimetric decomposition procedures aim to separate these different backscatter types [54,55]. As dual-pol SAR imagery was available for this study, the H/α decomposition proposed by Cloude and Pottier [40] was applied.…”
Section: Polarimetric Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two comprehensive reviews of this group of techniques can be found in [1,2]. The decomposition results have been used for a number of applications, such as target detection [3][4][5], land cover classification [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], and geophysical parameter inversion [14][15][16]. Freeman-Durden decomposition [17] is the pioneering work on model-based decompositions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [19] prepared a LULC map of muddy tidal flat wetlands based on DTC and achieved an OA value of 95.84%, a 4.44% increase compared with MLC. Qi et al [26] obtained a LULC map of the Panyu district in Guanzhou city, China using DTC combined with object-oriented classification (DTC-OOC) and RADRSAR-2 Polarimetric ASR (PolSAR) data. They estimated an OA of 86.64% and KC of 0.84, which corresponded to increases of 16.98% and 0.19 in comparison to respective values obtained with MLC.…”
Section: Analysis Of Classification Accuracy and Other Similar Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%