1981
DOI: 10.1017/s0003356100025083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the use of whole, moist barley treated with ammonia as a feed supplement for sheep

Abstract: Whole, moist barley treated with ammonia (A), whole, untreated barley (WU) and ground barley (G) were fed with hay and a little high protein, mixed concentrate. Digestibilities of dry matter, organic matter and crude fibre, assessed with young adult female sheep, were highest in diet A and lowest in diet G. The digestibilities of dry matter and crude fibre were also higher in diet WU than in diet G. Digestibility coefficients for dry matter and organic matter in barley, calculated by difference, appeared highe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While rumen fermentation patterns were not determined in the current study, Laksesvela (1981) reported lower concentrations of total VFAs in the rumen indicative of reduced ruminal grain degradation when ammoniated barley or whole barley was offered to sheep relative to ground barley. Furthermore, in the current study the increased forage intake occurred at the higher level of Table 6 Effects of grain treatment and feed level, and silage feed value on diet digestibility, nitrogen retention and grain egestion Mean values within a row having a different superscript letters differ (P , 0.05).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While rumen fermentation patterns were not determined in the current study, Laksesvela (1981) reported lower concentrations of total VFAs in the rumen indicative of reduced ruminal grain degradation when ammoniated barley or whole barley was offered to sheep relative to ground barley. Furthermore, in the current study the increased forage intake occurred at the higher level of Table 6 Effects of grain treatment and feed level, and silage feed value on diet digestibility, nitrogen retention and grain egestion Mean values within a row having a different superscript letters differ (P , 0.05).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The reduction in grain digestion due to urea treatment probably altered rumen fermentation patterns consequently increasing feed intake. Laksesvela (1981) concluded that relative to ground barley, moist barley treated with ammonia and whole untreated barley increased rumen pH and decreased the concentrations of volatile fatty acids (VFA) in the rumen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) For personal use only. (Montgomery et al 1980;Laksesvela 1981;Phillip et al 1985;Aosov and Kapustin 1986;Mathison et al 1989a). Also, Robinson and Kennelly (1989) have reported increased milk production when ammoniated barley was fed.…”
Section: Grain Preservation Trial (Experiments L)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rode et al (1986) reported similar observations in cattle, but ammoniation of high-moisture barley improved nutrient digestion by lambs (Laksesvela 1981) and cattle (Williams et al 1983) in comparison to diets containing physically processed barleys.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Digestion of CC was higher (P < 0.05) by steers fed rolled barley whereas digestion of NDF (Table 2) and ADF (Mandell 1986 (Laksesvela and Slagsvold 1980;Laksesvela 1981;Rode et al 1986). …”
mentioning
confidence: 97%