2001
DOI: 10.1017/s0959270901000223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the potential role of philopatry and conspecific attraction as conservation tools in Audouin's Gull Larus audouinii

Abstract: This short communication reports on the first record of Audouin's Gulls Larus audouinii breeding in captivity and on the behaviour of some individuals released as fledglings. During the period 1995-2000 a hand-reared male returned to its natal site and responded, year after year, to the translocation of a captive group of Audouin's Gulls for nesting site selection. The potential role of philopatry and conspecific attraction as conservation tools for this vulnerable seabird after an eight year experiment are di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under this scenario of no density dependence (an essential mechanism invoked to explain the IDD model; see and references therein), one question naturally arose: why did hundreds of birds select such a bad, poor‐quality, and peculiar patch? Several nonexclusive hypotheses might account for this phenomenon: birds colonizing the bare patch were attracted by conspecifics to the largest, denser subcolony, as is commonly recorded, especially in social species (i.e., the conspecific attraction; see Stenhouse and Montevecchi 2000, Green and Stamps 2001, Martínez‐Abrain et al 2001, Serrano et al 2004). Thus, birds probably used a social cue to erroneously select a poor patch for breeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this scenario of no density dependence (an essential mechanism invoked to explain the IDD model; see and references therein), one question naturally arose: why did hundreds of birds select such a bad, poor‐quality, and peculiar patch? Several nonexclusive hypotheses might account for this phenomenon: birds colonizing the bare patch were attracted by conspecifics to the largest, denser subcolony, as is commonly recorded, especially in social species (i.e., the conspecific attraction; see Stenhouse and Montevecchi 2000, Green and Stamps 2001, Martínez‐Abrain et al 2001, Serrano et al 2004). Thus, birds probably used a social cue to erroneously select a poor patch for breeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…introductions). This is being attempted with Audouin's gull in the western metapopulation, where a new local population is trying to be formed at Benidorm Island using management tools such as conspecific attraction (decoys) and hacking of chicks coming from other colonies (see also Martínez-Abraín et al, 2001). In the Mediterranean, we know from the fossil records that reduction of suitable patches for breeding seabirds is probably an ancient process related to the human colonisation of islands and marshes.…”
Section: The Audouin's Gull Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, birds were attracted and founded new colonies. This technique has been used successfully on a number of colonial bird species (Podolsky 1990; Podolsky & Kress 1992; Blokpoel et al 1997; Jeffries & Brunton 2001; Martinez‐Abrain et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%