2016
DOI: 10.1177/0013164415618992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Testing Mediated Effects in Structural Equation Models

Abstract: Methods to assess the significance of mediated effects in education and the social sciences are well studied and fall into two categories: single sample methods and computer-intensive methods. A popular single sample method to detect the significance of the mediated effect is the test of joint significance, and a popular computerintensive method to detect the significance of the mediated effect is the biascorrected bootstrap method. Both these methods are used for testing the significance of mediated effects i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the analysis of the moderating effects, we opted for probing latent interaction from products of indicators using residual centering (see Geldhof et al, 2013). In the mediational analysis, the bias-corrected bootstrap method was used to detect mediated effects in SEM to avoid the problems arising from the assumptions about the distribution of the coefficient of interest (Valente et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the analysis of the moderating effects, we opted for probing latent interaction from products of indicators using residual centering (see Geldhof et al, 2013). In the mediational analysis, the bias-corrected bootstrap method was used to detect mediated effects in SEM to avoid the problems arising from the assumptions about the distribution of the coefficient of interest (Valente et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, to handle skewness resulting from the indirect effects (mediating effects) produced by the direct effects and their distributions, we used 5000 bootstrap replicates to estimate bias-corrected confidence intervals and p-values (Lockwood CM and DP. 1998;Valente et al 2016). Finally, to check our estimates, we ran Bayesian estimation via the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm with a uniform prior (Byrne 2010; Kaplan and Depaoli 2012).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the mediational hypotheses (hypotheses 4 and 5), bootstrapped indirect effects were created using 10,000 bootstrapped samples (Valente et al, 2016). Lastly, a series of multigroup SEMs were utilized to examine hypothesis 6 (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%