2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on strategic delegation: The market share case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
167
6
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(15 reference statements)
3
167
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we also follow the standard assumption by managerial delegation theory that the fixed component (salary) of the manager pay is chosen by the firm's owner such that the manager exactly gets his/her opportunity cost, which is normalised to zero. More specifically, following for instance Vickers (1985), Jansen et al (2007Jansen et al ( , 2009), Fanti and Meccheri (2013), Meccheri and Fanti (2014), manager i receives a bonus that is proportional to…”
Section: The Model With Managerial Firmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we also follow the standard assumption by managerial delegation theory that the fixed component (salary) of the manager pay is chosen by the firm's owner such that the manager exactly gets his/her opportunity cost, which is normalised to zero. More specifically, following for instance Vickers (1985), Jansen et al (2007Jansen et al ( , 2009), Fanti and Meccheri (2013), Meccheri and Fanti (2014), manager i receives a bonus that is proportional to…”
Section: The Model With Managerial Firmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on delegation studies has established that the owner offers an incentive contract including sales revenue (Vickers, 1985;Fershtman and Judd, 1987;Sklivas, 1987), market share (Jansen et al, 2007), and a rival firm's profit (Aggarwal and Samwick, 1999). This paper studies the delegation game in which the firm's owner offers the manager a contract taking considering the weighted average of profit and either consumer surplus or social welfare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From (12), note that i = 0 for = 1. Therefore, one should expect marginal cost pricing to arise if …rms supply perfect substitutes.…”
Section: First Order Conditions and Limit Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative performance evaluation (Miller and Pazgal, 2001); pro…ts and market share (Jansen et al, 2007;Ritz, 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%