2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00154-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorization procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
120
1
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
120
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9, in), represent equal importance, weak importance, essential importance, demonstrated importance, and extreme importance, respectively; while the values 2, 4, 6, and 8 are used to compromise between the above values. (4) To calculate the importance degree, the normalisation of the geometric mean method is used to determine the important degrees of the decision maker's requirements (Escobar et al, 2004). Let W f denoted the importance degree (weight) for the f th criteria, then:…”
Section: Ahpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9, in), represent equal importance, weak importance, essential importance, demonstrated importance, and extreme importance, respectively; while the values 2, 4, 6, and 8 are used to compromise between the above values. (4) To calculate the importance degree, the normalisation of the geometric mean method is used to determine the important degrees of the decision maker's requirements (Escobar et al, 2004). Let W f denoted the importance degree (weight) for the f th criteria, then:…”
Section: Ahpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHP method was firstly proposed by Saaty [2][3][4][5][6][7]. It is an analytical method based on both mathematics and psychology for the decision making of perplex problems [5], and it has been successfully employed in many cases (e.g., major policy decisions, strategic planning, marketing applications, etc.)…”
Section: Ahp Methods Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…crisp values). For this measure, the thresholds associated with the 10% level of inconsistency suggested by Saaty are: GCI = 0.31 for n = 3, GCI = 0.35 for n = 4, GCI = 0.37 for n > 4 [42,43].…”
Section: Fuzzy Ahp Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%