2000
DOI: 10.1002/1099-131x(200009)19:5<457::aid-for761>3.0.co;2-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on aggregation, disaggregation and forecasting performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study finds that disaggregation does often not result in lower forecast errors compared to directly modelling the aggregate inflation rate. Zellner and Tobias (2000) also investigate forecasts of GDP growth…”
Section: Some Considerations On Contemporaneous Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study finds that disaggregation does often not result in lower forecast errors compared to directly modelling the aggregate inflation rate. Zellner and Tobias (2000) also investigate forecasts of GDP growth…”
Section: Some Considerations On Contemporaneous Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A disaggregated analysis can also be of interest if the impulse response functions of the components of a vector time series differ only in the short term, but then its results will only differ in the short run with respect to the results of an aggregate study. Certainly the practice of disaggregation has limits (Zellner and Tobias, 2000). In particular, if the quality of data deteriorates when disaggregating or the analyst does not succeed in modelling data properly, then the disaggregated models could be wrong and the forecasts derived from them for the aggregate could be much worse than the forecasts from an aggregate model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, the practice of disaggregation has limits (see Zellner and Tobias, 2000). In particular, if the quality of data deteriorates when disaggregating, or the analyst does not succeed in modelling the data properly, then the disaggregated models could be faulty, and the forecasts derived from them for the aggregate could be much worse than the forecasts from an aggregate model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%