The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.3233/wor-151996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A normative study of the Nine Hole Peg Test in Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed that the mean time to complete the task was significantly longer compared with age-matched and sex-matched normative data from healthy volunteers. 38 In previous studies, action tremor resulted in difficulties performing fine motor tasks (such as writing) and activities requiring gross motor coordination (such as attempting to hold and purposefully manipulate objects like a cup). 36 The name of this disease, as already known, cannot fully justify its anatomic origin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed that the mean time to complete the task was significantly longer compared with age-matched and sex-matched normative data from healthy volunteers. 38 In previous studies, action tremor resulted in difficulties performing fine motor tasks (such as writing) and activities requiring gross motor coordination (such as attempting to hold and purposefully manipulate objects like a cup). 36 The name of this disease, as already known, cannot fully justify its anatomic origin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants pick up the pegs to place them into the holes, then remove them from the holes with either left or right hand as fast as possible. The evaluator will record time to complete the assessment [60]. If the participants cann't place nine pegs into the holes within one minute, they will be asked not to continue the test [61].…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presenta una fiabilidad test/retest (ICC = 0,95 para mano derecha, ICC = 0,92 para mano izquierda). Fiabilidad interobservador para mano derecha (r=0,984) y para mano izquierda (r=0,993) (Lindstrom-Hazel et al, 2015).…”
Section: Métodosunclassified