2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nonlinear fatigue damage model: Comparison with experimental damage evolution of S355 (SAE 1020) structural steel and application to offshore jacket structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the larger difference of the load levels, the more significant the interaction effect will tend to be. For this reason, Aeran et al 36 further improve the model. The new model is as shown in Equation (3).…”
Section: The Nonlinear Fatigue Damage Accumulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the larger difference of the load levels, the more significant the interaction effect will tend to be. For this reason, Aeran et al 36 further improve the model. The new model is as shown in Equation (3).…”
Section: The Nonlinear Fatigue Damage Accumulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the knowledge of how the virtual PC eigenvectors' elements change for each mutually exclusive damage case in the virtual SHM, as shown in the Finite Element Model Sensitivity Analysis section (6), the combination of damage cases and damage intensities that most resembles the real structure behavior is searched with the objective function (7) to minimize the average NRMSE between the virtual PC eigenvectors' elements and the real SHM PC eigenvectors' elements results (8). However, it is unfeasible to run the FE analysis at the necessary amount of damage and intensity combinations to accurately target the objective function (7). Therefore, a Monte Carlo experiment is used to optimize a quasi-random sequence sampling of damage coefficients ξ as shown in Figure 13.…”
Section: Finite Element Model Updatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the NRMSE between the weighted virtual PCs fb vg k,m N × 1 and the real PC elements fvg k N × 1 for the first to fourth PCs' eigenvectors are calculated (8). Finally, the objective function (7) selects the Sobol sample vector fξg m j × 1 with the damage coefficients resulting in the smaller average of the NRMSE.…”
Section: Finite Element Model Updatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barbosa et al [ 14 ] investigated the growth rates of fatigue cracks in EH36 steel caused by submerged arc welding, and found that the threshold value of crack propagation in the fusion zone is higher than that in the base metal, because a large amount of acicular ferrite is formed in this zone, which impedes the crack propagation and can also cause the crack to deflect. Relevant papers related to the fatigue behavior mainly focus on establishing a fatigue damage model and measuring the S-N curves [ 15 , 16 ]. Wang et al [ 17 ] investigated the fatigue strength of EH36 steel with T-shape welded joints at low temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%