1999
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Non-oscillatory Eulerian Approach to Interfaces in Multimaterial Flows (the Ghost Fluid Method)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
1,367
0
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,687 publications
(1,389 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
13
1,367
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard finite differences cannot be applied across the interface due to the jump boundary conditions on Σ. The ghost cell method was developed to deal with this issue when solving elliptical problems by creating "ghost" computational points and using those ghost points in standard finite difference discretizations [15,[20][21][22]32]. In [34] and [36], we extended the ghost cell method to attain second-order accuracy on interior problems (i.e., p is constant in Ω c ) with boundary conditions that depend upon the geometry (e.g., curvature) and without a jump condition on the normal derivative.…”
Section: The Ghost Cell Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Standard finite differences cannot be applied across the interface due to the jump boundary conditions on Σ. The ghost cell method was developed to deal with this issue when solving elliptical problems by creating "ghost" computational points and using those ghost points in standard finite difference discretizations [15,[20][21][22]32]. In [34] and [36], we extended the ghost cell method to attain second-order accuracy on interior problems (i.e., p is constant in Ω c ) with boundary conditions that depend upon the geometry (e.g., curvature) and without a jump condition on the normal derivative.…”
Section: The Ghost Cell Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose we desire the normal vector at a computational node point (x i , y j ). If the level set is sufficiently smooth at the four points of {(x i−1 , y j ), (x i , y j−1 ), (x i+1 , y j ), (x i , y j+1 )} (i.e., Q < η at those points), then we use the standard normal vector discretization (15) where ε is a small positive number used to avoid division by zero; we use ε ∼ 10 −16 in our work.…”
Section: Calculating Geometric Quantitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is accomplished by first re-constructing the Cartesian velocity components at the volume centers-(i, j, k) nodes-by interpolating the contravariant velocity components and using Eq. (8). With the Cartesian velocity components available at the volume centers the convective and viscous terms (C (u m ) and D(u m ) for m = 1, 2, 3) can be readily discretized using the discretization method of choice (see below for details) in the same manner as in a non-staggered mesh.…”
Section: Hybrid Staggered/non-staggered Approach In Curvilinear Coordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former methods are known as immersed boundary formulations and tend to smear a solid boundary across few grid nodes due to the discrete delta function formulation they employ to introduce the effect of the boundary on the equations of motion [2]. The latter class of methods, on the other hand, treats solid boundaries as sharp interfaces utilizing either Cartesian, cut-cell formulations [3,4] or hybrid Cartesian/Immersed Boundary (HCIB) approaches (see [5,6,1,7] among others)-the reader is referred to [8,9] for more detailed discussion of this class of methods. Regardless on whether a diffused or a sharp interface formulation is employed, however, all available non-boundary conforming methods solve the Navier-Stokes equations in a background coordinate-conforming mesh, such as a Cartesian (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%