2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-invasive heart rate and blood pressure monitoring system using piezoelectric and photoplethysmographic sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 92 Samartkit developed a non-invasive heart rate and blood pressure monitoring system based on a PZT piezoelectric and photoplethysmographic sensor, and presented a modified pulse transit time technique to demodulate the time delay. 166 The experimental results showed that this system reaches an accuracy range of 93.33% (with respect to a reference device) of all heart rate measurements.…”
Section: Recent Advances Of Piezoelectric Micro-pressure Sensors For ...mentioning
confidence: 83%
“… 92 Samartkit developed a non-invasive heart rate and blood pressure monitoring system based on a PZT piezoelectric and photoplethysmographic sensor, and presented a modified pulse transit time technique to demodulate the time delay. 166 The experimental results showed that this system reaches an accuracy range of 93.33% (with respect to a reference device) of all heart rate measurements.…”
Section: Recent Advances Of Piezoelectric Micro-pressure Sensors For ...mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…To comprehensively compare our device with other competing approaches for wearable continuous blood pressure measurements, 8,12,15,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] we summarize the state-of-the-art methods in Table S2 (ESI †). Most methods evaluate the blood pressure measurement accuracy through subject-specific calibration without considering the generalizability of the models.…”
Section: Results Of Blood Pressure Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While both techniques can record PW/PTT, the methodology differs (pressure vs. Infrared). Prior non-clinical studies have shown that both techniques are similar with regards to respiratory rate tracking via finger probe [43][44][45][46]. Both techniques showed no major difference for HR, HRV, and PW tracking amongst a cohort of healthy volunteers.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 86%