2019
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201900230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non‐gassing electroosmotic pump with sandwich of poly(2‐ethyl aniline)‐Prussian blue nanocomposite and PVDF membrane

Abstract: Low voltage, non‐gassing electroosmotic pump (EOP) was assembled with poly(2‐ethyl aniline) (EPANI)‐Prussian blue nanocomposite electrode and commercially available hydrophilic PVDF membranes. The nanocomposite material combines excellent oxidation/reduction capacity of EPANI with exceptional stability by shuttling of proton between Prussian blue nanoparticles and EPANI redox matrix. The flow rate was highly dependent on the electrode composition but it was linear with applied voltage. The flow rate at 5 V for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure , the order of the potential drop for the three pumps was PUMP-I < PUMP-II > PUMP-III, and they were in accord with the obtained electroosmotic flux and efficiency. The efficiency was measured by measuring the maximum stall pressure (Figure B) provided at the minimum applied voltage as reported. , The best efficiency of 0.006% was obtained for PUMP-I followed by PUMP-III and PUMP-II. These are in the range of thermodynamic efficiencies of 0.005–2.0% reported in the literature. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure , the order of the potential drop for the three pumps was PUMP-I < PUMP-II > PUMP-III, and they were in accord with the obtained electroosmotic flux and efficiency. The efficiency was measured by measuring the maximum stall pressure (Figure B) provided at the minimum applied voltage as reported. , The best efficiency of 0.006% was obtained for PUMP-I followed by PUMP-III and PUMP-II. These are in the range of thermodynamic efficiencies of 0.005–2.0% reported in the literature. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The efficiency was measured by measuring the maximum stall pressure (Figure 6B) provided at the minimum applied voltage as reported. 27,46 The best efficiency of 0.006% was obtained for PUMP-I followed by PUMP-III and PUMP-II. These are in the range of thermodynamic efficiencies of 0.005−2.0% reported in the literature.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linearity was observed when the peak current was plotted versus the square root of the scan rate according to the Randles-Sevcik equation. 45 The obtained straight line indicates that the charge storage mechanism was predominantly due to the diffusion-controlled process, not by the non-faradaic surface-confined phenomenon (inset Fig. S5, ESI †).…”
Section: Materials Advances Papermentioning
confidence: 90%
“…From cyclic voltammetry analysis at different sweep rates, D Zn 2 + was calculated by applying the Randles-Sevcik relation [Equation (1)]. [58,59]…”
Section: Electrochemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%