2014
DOI: 10.1086/675079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A next-generation sequencing approach to river biomonitoring using benthic diatoms

Abstract: Diatoms are main bioindicators used to assess the ecological quality of rivers, but their identification is difficult and time-consuming. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) can be used to study communities of microorganisms, so we carried out a test of the reliability of 454 pyrosequencing for estimating diatom inventories in environmental samples. We used small subunit ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid (SSU rDNA), ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase (rbcL), and cytochrome oxidase I (COI) markers and examined r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
96
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(52 reference statements)
4
96
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular identification is useful for more accurate species identification and for assessing the biodiversity of environmental samples (Kermarrec et al, 2013(Kermarrec et al, , 2014Leliaert et al, 2014;Zimmermann et al, 2015). The molecular markers most commonly employed for species delimitations in diatoms are: the plastid gene rbcL, the mitochondrial gene cythocrome oxidase I (COI), the small ribosomal subunit (SSU), the large ribosomal (LSU), and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the nuclear rDNA (Amato et al, 2007;Evans et al, 2007;Hamsher et al, 2011;MacGillivary and Kaczmarska, 2011;Zimmermann et al, 2011;Kermarrec et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Molecular identification is useful for more accurate species identification and for assessing the biodiversity of environmental samples (Kermarrec et al, 2013(Kermarrec et al, , 2014Leliaert et al, 2014;Zimmermann et al, 2015). The molecular markers most commonly employed for species delimitations in diatoms are: the plastid gene rbcL, the mitochondrial gene cythocrome oxidase I (COI), the small ribosomal subunit (SSU), the large ribosomal (LSU), and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the nuclear rDNA (Amato et al, 2007;Evans et al, 2007;Hamsher et al, 2011;MacGillivary and Kaczmarska, 2011;Zimmermann et al, 2011;Kermarrec et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently advances in nextgeneration sequencing (NGS) technologies offer the possibility to use molecular barcoding for fast and reliable diversity surveys. With this technology, a new approach for analyzing environmental samples has been developed and is called (e-DNA) barcoding or metabarcoding (Kermarrec et al, 2014). In this context, metabarcoding can provide a valuable information to study biodiversity, food web dynamics, environmental and invasive species monitoring, and for reconstructing changes in biodiversity through time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After using the OBITools pipeline the final results were entered into a spreadsheet and were further filtered manually. First, all sequences with less \96 % match to entries in the diatom reference library were removed to guarantee good taxonomic assignation, which we based on the average of intra-genus variation in the rbcL gene (Kermarrec et al 2014). Second, we subtracted the diatom sequence counts found in the extraction blanks or NTCs from the relevant samples belonging to each extraction and/or PCR batch.…”
Section: Genetic Diatom Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such sequence length has been shown to be long enough for applied topics such as the one addressed here: diatom species identification for ecological assessment (e.g. Kermarrec et al 2014;Zimmermann et al 2015;Visco et al 2015). It will be straightforward to expand such methodology to wider monitoring networks, if taxonomic experts are available who can follow the recommendations we propose here.…”
Section: Conclusion: Limits Of the Proposed Methodology And Perspectmentioning
confidence: 99%