A New Targeting - A New Take-Up? Non-Take-Up of Social Assistance in Germany after Social Policy Reforms

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. This series presents research findings based either directly on data from the German SocioEconomic Panel Study (SOEP) or using SOEP data as part of an internationally comparable data set (e.g. CNEF, ECHP, LIS, LWS, CHER/PACO). SOEP is a truly multidisciplinary household panel study covering a wide range of social and behavioral sciences: economics, sociology, psychology, survey methodology, econometrics and applied statistics, educational science, political science, public health, behavioral genetics, demography, geography, and sport science. Terms of use: Documents inThe decision to publish a submission in SOEPpapers is made by a board of editors chosen by the DIW Berlin to represent the wide range of disciplines covered by SOEP. There is no external referee process and papers are either accepted or rejected without revision. Papers appear in this series as works in progress and may also appear elsewhere. They often represent preliminary studies and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be requested from the author directly. We present first estimates of rates of non-take-up for social assistance in Germany after the implementation of major social policy reforms in 2005. The analysis is based on a microsimulation model, which includes a detailed description of the German social assistance programme. Our findings suggest a moderate decrease in non-takeup compared to estimates before the reform. In order to identify the determinants of claiming social assistance, we estimate a model of take-up behaviour which considers potential endogeneity of the benefit level. The estimations reveal that the degree of needs, measured as the social assistance benefit level a household is eligible for, and the expected duration of eligibility are the key determinants of the take-up decision, while costs of claiming seem to play a minor role.JEL Classification: I38, H31, C15

The welfare use of immigrants and natives in Germany: the case of Turkish immigrants

“…The authors find that -given eligibility -immigrant households are no more likely to take-up benefits than native households. Bruckmeier and Wiemers (2012) confirm this result based on more recent data. Using the 1984-1996 waves of the SOEP, Riphahn (2004) jointly modeled panel attrition, labor force status, and household social assistance dependence.…”

Patterns of Welfare Dependence before and after a Reform: Evidence from First Generation Immigrants and Natives in Germany

“…Certainly, the broad and mostly very critical public debate enhanced awareness of the new benefit program. In this situation, many observers expect an increase in the propensity to take up benefits given eligibility (e.g., Bruckmeier and Wiemers, 2011).…”

Marginal employment for welfare recipients: stepping stone or obstacle?

“…A refusal to accept job offers or a lacking willingness for job search activities can lead to benefit cuts. Compared to the previous systems of social and unemployment assistance, the amount of earned income that benefit recipients are allowed to retain is higher under UB II (Bruckmeier and Wiemers, 2011). Recipients can earn a gross income of 100 € per month before their welfare benefits are reduced.…”