2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new synergistic approach for monitoring wetlands using Sentinels -1 and 2 data with object-based machine learning algorithms

Abstract: In this work the synergistic use of Sentinel-1 and 2 combined with the System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) Wetness Index in the content of land use/cover (LULC) mapping with emphasis in wetlands is evaluated. A further objective has been to a new Object-based Image Analysis (OBIA) approach for mapping wetland areas using Sentinel-1 and 2 data, where the latter is also tested against two popular machine learning algorithms (Support Vector Machines -SVMs and Random Forests -RFs). The highly vulner… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
120
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
7
120
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a synergistic use of two types of data offers complementary information, which may be lacking when utilizing one source of data [41,42]. Several studies have also highlighted the great potential of fusing optical and SAR data for wetland classification [25,36,41]. This study aims to develop a multi-temporal classification approach based on open-access remote sensing data and tools to map wetland classes as well as the other land cover types with high accuracy, here piloting this approach for wetland mapping in Canada.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, a synergistic use of two types of data offers complementary information, which may be lacking when utilizing one source of data [41,42]. Several studies have also highlighted the great potential of fusing optical and SAR data for wetland classification [25,36,41]. This study aims to develop a multi-temporal classification approach based on open-access remote sensing data and tools to map wetland classes as well as the other land cover types with high accuracy, here piloting this approach for wetland mapping in Canada.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, RF is much easier to execute relative to SVM, given that the latter approach requires the adjustment of a large number of parameters [23]. RF is also insensitive to noise and overtraining [24] and has shown high classification accuracies in various wetland studies [19,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While wetland classes were accurately characterised, the accuracy of the extent of wetland classification was not identified in this study. Machine learning imputation and Support Vector Machine [272] supervised classification learning methods for land cover and wetland class, form, and type have average accuracies of 80% and 79% respectively, and range from 72%-99% (random forest) (e.g., References [35,36,38,52,75,113,155,203,271]) and 73%-90% (Support Vector Machine) (e.g., References [49,61,75,91,99,101,116]). These exceed the proposed minimum accuracy requirements in regions such as Alberta Canada but require that training data capture the full variability of each class identified by the classifier [273,274].…”
Section: Wetland Extent For Baseline Inventory and Long-term Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the recent trend of introducing machine learning (ML) into remote sensing, water classification has borrowed many algorithms from the machine learning field [36][37][38]. Among ML (including deep learning), support vector machine (SVM) is a commonly used one with possible explicitly mathematical structure of outputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%