2019
DOI: 10.3390/jcm8040480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Surgical Site Infection Risk Score: Infection Risk Index in Cardiac Surgery

Abstract: Various scoring systems attempt to predict the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) after cardiac surgery, but their discrimination is limited. Our aim was to analyze all SSI risk factors in both coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and valve replacement patients in order to create a new SSI risk score for such individuals. A priori prospective collected data on patients that underwent cardiac surgery (n = 2020) were analyzed following recommendations from the Reporting of studies Conducted using Observational… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgery-related variables included type of surgery based on surgical site (colorectal or non-colorectal), surgical wound class (clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty), methods of bowel preparation (mechanical bowel preparation [MBP] or oral antibiotic bowel preparation [OABP]), hand preparation (disinfectant or scrubbing), use of laparoscopy or robotic surgery, use of incisional protection devices (gauze, adhesive drapes, wound edge protector, or something else), grade of lead surgeon (based on their title), duration of surgery (from incision to suture), and the national nosocomial infections surveillance (NNIS) risk index. The NNIS risk index ranged from 0 to 3 per the assessment of three variables: ASA score, surgical wound class, and duration of surgery; the cutoff values for each variable were an ASA score of 3, a contaminated surgical incision, and an operative time of 180 min, with 1 point assigned when each variable exceeded its respective cutoff value 12 . Antibiotic-related variables included the use of preoperative and postoperative antibiotics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgery-related variables included type of surgery based on surgical site (colorectal or non-colorectal), surgical wound class (clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty), methods of bowel preparation (mechanical bowel preparation [MBP] or oral antibiotic bowel preparation [OABP]), hand preparation (disinfectant or scrubbing), use of laparoscopy or robotic surgery, use of incisional protection devices (gauze, adhesive drapes, wound edge protector, or something else), grade of lead surgeon (based on their title), duration of surgery (from incision to suture), and the national nosocomial infections surveillance (NNIS) risk index. The NNIS risk index ranged from 0 to 3 per the assessment of three variables: ASA score, surgical wound class, and duration of surgery; the cutoff values for each variable were an ASA score of 3, a contaminated surgical incision, and an operative time of 180 min, with 1 point assigned when each variable exceeded its respective cutoff value 12 . Antibiotic-related variables included the use of preoperative and postoperative antibiotics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgery-related variables included type of surgery based on surgical site (colorectal or non-colorectal), surgical wound class (clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty), methods of bowel preparation (mechanical bowel preparation [MBP] or oral antibiotic bowel preparation [OABP]), hand preparation (disinfectant or scrubbing), use of laparoscopy or robotic surgery, use of incisional protection devices (gauze, adhesive drapes, wound edge protector, or something else), grade of lead surgeon (based on their title), duration of surgery (from incision to suture), and the national nosocomial infections surveillance (NNIS) risk index. The NNIS risk index ranged from 0 to 3 per the assessment of three variables: ASA score, surgical wound class, and duration of surgery; the cutoff values for each variable were an ASA score of 3, a contaminated surgical incision, and an operative time of 180 min, with 1 point assigned when each variable exceeded its respective cutoff value [12]. Antibioticrelated variables included the use of preoperative and postoperative antibiotics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No mapeamento das complicações apareceram em realce às complicações infecciosas que estão entre as mais frequentes e foram citadas nos estudos analisados (17,18,22,24,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(34)(35)(36) . Elas destacam-se devido a sua gravidade.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Infecção respiratória e pneumonia (17,18,22,24,28,30,34,35) 8 38,10 Infecções de sítio cirúrgico (17,22,24,28,35,36) 6 28,57 Mediastinite (24, 27-29, 30, 31) 6 28,57 Infecção do trato urinário (22,24,28,(34)(35) 5 23,81 Infecção de corrente sanguínea (22,34) 2 9,52 Sepse (24,35) 2 9,52 Endocardite (28,35) 2 9,52 Neurológicas Acidente vascular encefálico (23-25, 28, 30, 34, 35, 37) 8 38,10 Delirium pós-operatório (20,34,36) 3 14,29 Alteração sensorial, motora ou de reflexos (28,34) 2 9,52 Convulsão (24) 1 4,76 Alteração do nível de consciência ou coma (28) 1 4,76 Cardiovasculares Sangramentos (18,24,29,(34)(35)(36) 6 28,57 Fibrilação Atrial (19,21,24,25,29) 5 23,81 Infarto agudo do miocárdio (28)(29)…”
Section: Tipo De Complicação Fr % Infecciosasunclassified