“…Sixty-nine Zootaxa studies described 76 new living mammals (see Appendix I), including Niviventer pianmaensis, which was described as a subspecies (Li & Yang 2009), and Conilurus capricornensis, which was described from cave material but is thought to still be extant (Cramb & Hocknull 2010). The vast majority of studies (Figure 5) employed an integrative approach, with a combination of two or more types of data, including detailed comparative anatomy analyses, especially of cranial, dental, and integumental anatomy, but also bacular (e.g., Goodman et al 2017;Kruskop et al 2019); morphometric multivariate analyses, based mainly on craniometric traditional measurements using principal component and discriminant analyses, but also employing MANOVA (Goodman et al 2015) or using a geometric morphometrics approach (Cucchi et al 2006;Taylor et al 2011); phylogenetic analyses of molecular sequence data, especially cytochrome b, but also cytochrome oxidase 1, d-loop, ribosomal 12s and 15s, ND2, and nuclear loci such as IRBP and RAG1; classic cytogenetics, especially for rodents but also used in the description of the vespertilionid bat Laephotis stanleyi (Goodman et al 2017); and comparative echolocation analyses for bats (e.g., Reardon et al 2008;Soisook et al 2013Soisook et al , 2015Soisook et al , 2017Goodman et al 2011Goodman et al , 2015Puechmaille et al 2014). Other sources of data less commonly employed in species descriptions were allozymes (Reardon et al 2008;Verheyen et al 2011), microsatellites (Puechmaille et al 2014;Ralph et al 2015), and niche modeling (Ralph et al 2015).…”