2014
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3795.4.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new species of Miroculis Edmunds, 1963 (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) from Northeastern Brazil

Abstract: Miroculis stenopterus, sp. nov., is described based on material from State of Pernambuco, Northeastern Brazil. The imago of the new species can be distinguished, among other characteristics, by an uncommon forewing shape, long and narrow, similar to species of genus Microphlebia. The tentatively associated nymph can be distinguished from other species of the genus mainly by the abdominal color pattern and the ratio of labial palp segment 2 to segment 1 (1.01-1.04 x).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the description of the genus based on a single species from Peru [1], Savage and Peters [2] performed a revision of the genus and described 10 new species allocated into four newly proposed subgenera. From 2007 on, 18 additional species have been described, the vast majority within Miroculis (Miroculis) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The taxonomic knowledge concerning the other subgenera, therefore, remain practically unaltered since Savage and Peters [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the description of the genus based on a single species from Peru [1], Savage and Peters [2] performed a revision of the genus and described 10 new species allocated into four newly proposed subgenera. From 2007 on, 18 additional species have been described, the vast majority within Miroculis (Miroculis) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The taxonomic knowledge concerning the other subgenera, therefore, remain practically unaltered since Savage and Peters [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%