2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-009-0128-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new reporting form for breast cytology

Abstract: The Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy Subcommittee, organized under the Rules Committee of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, has prepared a new form for breast cytology reports. This reporting form consists of "diagnostic categories" and "recommendations." The "diagnostic category" is either "specimen inadequacy" or "specimen adequacy." The judgment on "specimen adequacy" is subdivided into four categories: "normal or benign," "indeterminate," "suspicious for malignancy," and "malignant." The "recommendation" … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synoptic reporting of pathology results is gaining acceptance in Asia and North America. A synoptic report was recently developed and used in Japan to accurately report breast cytology results in a series of 3439 cases [ 24 ]. Additionally, a cancer reporting project conducted in Ontario, Canada by Srigley et al found that a province-wide implementation of a synoptic reporting format generated more complete reports and led to increased rates of cancer reporting [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synoptic reporting of pathology results is gaining acceptance in Asia and North America. A synoptic report was recently developed and used in Japan to accurately report breast cytology results in a series of 3439 cases [ 24 ]. Additionally, a cancer reporting project conducted in Ontario, Canada by Srigley et al found that a province-wide implementation of a synoptic reporting format generated more complete reports and led to increased rates of cancer reporting [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The records of all pathologic breast reports were collected and classified under the following categories[18]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, the non‐diagnostic / unsatisfactory rate was 12.9% and ranged from 1.8 to 23.6% . In addition, in a recent update of the reporting system for breast cytology by the Japanese Breast Society, the desired threshold of unsatisfactory samples was found to be 10% or fewer of all samples . Therefore, we considered a 15.4% unsatisfactory rate in endometrial cytology in our study comparable to a 12.9% unsatisfactory rate of thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNAs) and a 10% unsatisfactory rate of breast FNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%