Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of endometrial cytology obtained by intrauterine sample using a descriptive reporting format for endometrial cytological diagnosis. Study Design: 10,152 consecutive endometrial scrapings obtained in 13 different Japanese hospitals were analyzed. Cytological results were classified as ‘negative for malignancy’, ‘atypical endometrial cells’ (ATEC), ‘endometrial hyperplasia’, ‘atypical endometrial hyperplasia’ or ‘malignant tumor’. ATEC was subclassified as ‘ATEC, of undetermined significance’ (ATEC-US) and ‘ATEC, cannot exclude atypical endometrial hyperplasia or more’ (ATEC-A). Cytological results were compared with the histological diagnosis as a gold standard. When the cytological result was ‘negative for malignancy’ and there was no subsequent histological examination, the case was considered a true negative when the endometrium was assessed as normal on transvaginal ultrasonography and there was no abnormal uterine bleeding. Results: 1,083 cases in which histology was not performed, 557 cases of ‘unsatisfactory specimen’ and 76 cases of ATEC-US were excluded. In the remaining 8,436 cases, the sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for detecting atypical endometrial hyperplasia or malignant tumors were 79.0 and 99.7, 92.9 and 98.9%, respectively. Conclusion: The current diagnostic standards for endometrial cytology in Japan were established. Specificity is satisfactory for excluding cancer or precancerous diseases.
The results of this study revealed that applying diagnostic criteria used in CCP to LBC was easy to achieve, because LBC had excellent cytoarchitectural preservation and cells were well presented. Although we have not examined all cytological features of malignancy and have not considered atypical hyperplasia, we believe that this method may be a useful tool in the diagnosis of endometrial cytology.
Careful cytomorphologic evaluation of abnormal endometrial lesions has made accurate and reproducible microscopic assessment possible. Histopathology of patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding due to an anovulatory cycle usually contain endometrial glandular and stromal breakdown (EGBD) and papillary metaplasia on the endometrial surface epithelium, if an appropriate sample has been collected. We often recognized abnormal cell clumps in the cytological smears with EGBD cases. They were composed of metaplastic cells, and some irregular small projection figures were observed from the margins of the cell clumps. We describe the quantitation of metaplastic clumps with irregular protrusions (MCIP) in endometrial endocyte samples. The current study presents the cytomorphological characteristics of the metaplastic changes recognized in EGBD cases. During a 7-yr period, 144 cases for which histopathological diagnoses were obtained following endometrial curettage, after collecting a direct endometrial sample using the endocyte. The material comprised 49 cases of normal proliferative endometrium (NPE) (patients aged 28-51, average 39.9), 32 cases of EGBD (patients aged 30-67, average 49.6), and 63 cases of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (EH) (patients aged 35-65, average 47.7). The following points were investigated: (1) the occurrence of metaplastic cells; (2) the occurrence and the frequency of MCIP; and (3) the occurrence of MCIP that contains condensed stromal clusters. Metaplastic cells were seen in 93.8% of the EGBD cases. Cytomorphologic pattern identified with MCIP was 90.6%, and its frequency showed 16.1%. The occurrence of MCIP that contain condensed stromal clusters (93.1%) showed a strong association in comparison with other lesions, such as NPE and EH. Our data appear to indicate that the appearance of MCIP with condensed stromal clusters originated from the papillary metaplasia, which occurred on the endometrial surface epithelium. The cytologic observation of those cells may be a useful indicator for providing the nature of EGBD endometrium.
Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the BD SurePath™ liquid-based Papanicolaou test for assessing the cytology of intrauterine endometrial samples according to newly devised cytological diagnostic criteria and a novel descriptive reporting format. Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty-two endometrial samples were analyzed. All samples were obtained directly from the intrauterine cavity using the Uterobrush or Honest Super Brush. The samples used for the histological examination and cytological tests were collected simultaneously. Our study group devised new cytological diagnostic criteria for examining endometrial samples: the Osaki Study Group method. In this study, histological diagnosis was considered to be the gold standard for cytological diagnosis. A novel descriptive reporting format was also used. Results: Satisfactory cytological specimens were obtained in all cases. The sensitivity and specificity of the SurePath endometrial cytological examination method were 96.4 and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: These results indicate that the SurePath method is acceptable for clinical use. Since the SurePath method seems to be easier and allows greater preparation standardization than the conventional method, coupling it with our newly devised cytological diagnostic criteria and descriptive reporting format might represent a reliable diagnostic method for assessing endometrial specimens.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.