2020
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4499.20190271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new proposal for the m + a methodology in segregating populations of cowpea

Abstract: The evaluation of segregating populations in plant breeding programs is an onerous and time-consuming process. Early identification of populations with genetic potential can be done by m + a methodology. However, the possibility of a modification in the traditional methodology in order to make it more efficient, that is, faster and cheaper, was envisaged. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare the genetic gains obtained by both methodologies, the traditional one and the proposed modification. For thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In considering only m + a′ values for traits related to production (fruit number, average fruit weight, and yield), it can be said that the most promising hybrids for line selection are H6, H4, and H5 (Table 4). Matos et al (2020), in estimating m + a′ values of segregating populations of cowpea, observed that methodology is shown to be feasible for identifying populations with genetic potential for the early selection.…”
Section: Effect M + A′ Estimates On Agronomic Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In considering only m + a′ values for traits related to production (fruit number, average fruit weight, and yield), it can be said that the most promising hybrids for line selection are H6, H4, and H5 (Table 4). Matos et al (2020), in estimating m + a′ values of segregating populations of cowpea, observed that methodology is shown to be feasible for identifying populations with genetic potential for the early selection.…”
Section: Effect M + A′ Estimates On Agronomic Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%