1976
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1976.tb00050.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Personal Disturbance Scale (DSSI/sAD)

Abstract: A brief self-report measure of personal disturbance is presented. Being derived from the Delusions-Symptoms-States Inventory, it focuses exclusively on recent symptomatology, uncontaminated by personality attributes. Data are presented which show significant agreement (a) for the allocation of the items to syndromes by experiences raters, and (b) between patients' self-report and their psychiatrists' ratings. At the anxiety, depression, and total sAD scale levels a high discrimination is found between the norm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
127
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the original sample, a subset of 816 mothers and adolescents was selected for follow-up based on the mother's self-report of depression on the Delusion-States Symptom Inventory (DSSI; Bedford, Foulds, & Sheffield, 1976) during the initial phases of the study, with the intention of including women with a range of depression experiences, including no depression, oversampling those with elevated and/or persisting levels of depressive symptoms. Selection of women with likely clinically…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the original sample, a subset of 816 mothers and adolescents was selected for follow-up based on the mother's self-report of depression on the Delusion-States Symptom Inventory (DSSI; Bedford, Foulds, & Sheffield, 1976) during the initial phases of the study, with the intention of including women with a range of depression experiences, including no depression, oversampling those with elevated and/or persisting levels of depressive symptoms. Selection of women with likely clinically…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample (n ¼ 1002, from n ¼ 1997 contacted) was obtained by random selection from the electoral roll of the division of Lyndsey. FGID (IBS and functional dyspepsia) were evaluated according to Rome II criteria, 26 which were current at the time of this study, whereas mood disorders were evaluated using the Delusion Symptom States Inventory, 27 which yields separate scores for anxiety and depression.…”
Section: Study 2: Australian General Population Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the original birth cohort sample, mothers selfreported depression symptoms on the Delusion States Symptom Inventory (DSSI; Bedford, Foulds, & Sheffield, 1976) at the four time points indicated above. On the basis of mothers' scores representing diverse (or no) experiences of depressive symptoms, a smaller subset of 816 mothers and their children was selected for followup at youth age 15 for the Queensland High Risk Project (P. Brennan & C. Hammen, investigators).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%