2008
DOI: 10.1002/nav.20315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new outranking‐based approach for assigning alternatives to ordered classes

Abstract: Abstract:We consider the problem of assigning alternatives evaluated on several criteria into ordered categories C 1 , C 2 , . . . , C p . This problem is known as the multi-criteria sorting problem and arises in many situations such as classifying countries into different risk levels based on economical and socio-political criteria, evaluating credit applications of bank customers. We are interested in sorting methods that are grounded on the construction of outranking relations. Among these, the Electre Tri … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…His/her preferences are represented by an index of credibility of the outranking σ that models the degree of credibility of the outranking. As in [15] and [19], given a certain credibility threshold λ, the general approach of THESEUS is based on the fulfilment of the implications ∀ ∈ ( , ) ≥ λ ⇒ ( ) ≿ ( ) (1.a) ( , ) ≥ λ ⇒ ( ) ≿ ( ) (1.b) (where C(b) denotes the category to which the object b was assigned; C(x) is the most appropriate assignment of x; and ≿ denotes the statement "at least as good as" on the set of categories, which is related to the decision-aiding context).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His/her preferences are represented by an index of credibility of the outranking σ that models the degree of credibility of the outranking. As in [15] and [19], given a certain credibility threshold λ, the general approach of THESEUS is based on the fulfilment of the implications ∀ ∈ ( , ) ≥ λ ⇒ ( ) ≿ ( ) (1.a) ( , ) ≥ λ ⇒ ( ) ≿ ( ) (1.b) (where C(b) denotes the category to which the object b was assigned; C(x) is the most appropriate assignment of x; and ≿ denotes the statement "at least as good as" on the set of categories, which is related to the decision-aiding context).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifying the class profiles can be an overwhelming task for a DM. For such decision making situations, there were proposed some outranking methods which require the DM to provide indirect preference information in the form of assignment examples (see, e.g., [6,16,21]). An outranking model is said to be consistent with a set of assignment examples if and only if:…”
Section: Electre-like Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To see how our algorithm performs when we increase the number of criteria and/or the number of alternatives to be evaluated, we generated 100 random sets of alternatives where scores on a given criteria for all alternatives were generated from a Normal distribution with mean μ and standard deviation σ . We generated μ from U [10,20] and σ from U [2,6]. We rescaled all scores so that they were between 0 and 1.…”
Section: Performance Of the Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%