2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new methodology to improve interpretability in neuro-fuzzy TSK models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…60 So, the membership degree of the intersection point of neighboring fuzzy numbers should be less than or equal to 0.5, that is, 𝜇 Ã(𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡) ≤ 0.5. 61 Several researchers have proposed a value of 0.5 in modeling safety risk. 58,62 It should be noted that developing a fuzzy interval from a crisp interval may result in a linguistic label with meaningless values, or the sum of the membership degrees of neighboring fuzzy numbers for a point in the overlap may be greater than 1.0.…”
Section: Development Of Fuzzy Intervals For the Parameters Of The Req...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 So, the membership degree of the intersection point of neighboring fuzzy numbers should be less than or equal to 0.5, that is, 𝜇 Ã(𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡) ≤ 0.5. 61 Several researchers have proposed a value of 0.5 in modeling safety risk. 58,62 It should be noted that developing a fuzzy interval from a crisp interval may result in a linguistic label with meaningless values, or the sum of the membership degrees of neighboring fuzzy numbers for a point in the overlap may be greater than 1.0.…”
Section: Development Of Fuzzy Intervals For the Parameters Of The Req...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first factor, transparency, is related to interpretability of the fuzzy sets. The fuzzy sets should be interpretable as linguistic labels that are meaningful for experts in the problem under study [43]. In MGP-INTACTSKY, a specified number of fuzzy sets are assigned to each input variable that are interpretable as linguistic labels.…”
Section: Tsk Fuzzy Rule Based System: a New Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…La hibridación de estas dos técnicas se impulsó notablemente a principio de la década de los 90 con los trabajos de Jang (1991de Jang ( , 1992de Jang ( , 1993, Lin y Lee (1991), y Berenji y Khedkar (1992). Desde entonces los sistemas neuro-borrosos han permitido combinar la capacidad de adaptabilidad de las redes neuronales con la interpretabilidad y robustez intrínseca de los sistemas borroso (Pok y Xu, 1994, Vélez et al, 2010. Pero esta no es la única hibridación a la que se ha sometido a la lógica borrosa, también se ha integrado con algoritmos genéticos y bioinspirados (evolutionary computing), con técnicas probabilísticas (probabilistic computing), y con las herramientas tanto clásicas, como el consagrado PID (Ying et al, 1990, Zhao et al, 1993, Santos et al, 1996, Mudi y Pal, 1999, Tang et al, 2001), como modernas de la teoría de control (Albertos y Sala, 2004), convirtiéndose en una de las herramientas principales del denominado Control Inteligente 1 .…”
Section: Sciencedirectunclassified