2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new methodology to identify and quantify material resource at a large scale for earth construction – Application to cob in Brittany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many variations of the vernacular cob construction process resulting from the adaptation of the technique to local environments the earth could have been adapted to the cob process. For example the addition of fibers was often used to limit shrinkage cracks and made it possible the use of clayey earth [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many variations of the vernacular cob construction process resulting from the adaptation of the technique to local environments the earth could have been adapted to the cob process. For example the addition of fibers was often used to limit shrinkage cracks and made it possible the use of clayey earth [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Among these construction wastes, about 75 % consist of soils and stones [5], [6]. As already 5 highlighted for cob in Brittany, the earth building sector has a strong reuse potential for 6 earthwork wastes [7]. Planning authorities and earthwork contractors need a decision tool to be 7 able to identify the potentially reusable material among their excavated soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, texture of materials collected in vernacular earth heritage buildings do not systematically fit inside those grading envelopes [15]- [18]. Thus, grading envelopes available in the literature failed to give full account of the diversity of earth employed for construction [7], [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations