2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new methodology for generating and combining statistical forecasting models to enhance competitive event prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common combination forecasting models are linear combination of all available individual forecast models in tourism literature. The researchers (Andrawisa et al, 2011, Chan et al, 2010Coshall & Charlesworth, 2011;Freitas & Rodrigues, 2006;Lessmann et al, 2012;Menezes, Bunn & Taylor, 2000;Shen, Li & Song, 2011) have demonstrated the efficiency of combination forecasts and the superiority of combination forecasts in contrast to individual forecasts. However all available individual models are used as inputs for the combinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common combination forecasting models are linear combination of all available individual forecast models in tourism literature. The researchers (Andrawisa et al, 2011, Chan et al, 2010Coshall & Charlesworth, 2011;Freitas & Rodrigues, 2006;Lessmann et al, 2012;Menezes, Bunn & Taylor, 2000;Shen, Li & Song, 2011) have demonstrated the efficiency of combination forecasts and the superiority of combination forecasts in contrast to individual forecasts. However all available individual models are used as inputs for the combinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then it has been demonstrated that forecast combinations are often superior to their constituent forecasts in many fields (Greer, 2005;Hall & Mitchell, 2007;Holden & Peel, 1986;Lessmann et al (2012) ;Li, Shi & Zhou, 2011;Newbold & Granger, 1974;Sánchez, 2 2008;Timmermann, Elliott & Granger, 2006;Winkler & Makridakis, 1983;Zheng, Lee & Shi, 2006). The most widely used and studied combination forecast methods are ensemble methods, such as bagging (Breiman, 1996) and boosting methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such settings, pseudo-R 2 s, which are equivalent measures to R 2 for nonlinear models, are generally recommended (e.g., Greene, 2012;Maddala, 1983). In fact, in any environment where one seeks to use probability predictions to make pecuniary gain (e.g., in options, futures, spread trading and betting markets), it can be shown that there is a direct link between increases in pseudo-R 2 values and out-of-sample returns (e.g., Benter, 1994;Lessmann et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the many applications for discrete choice models is in the forecasting 4 of competitive event (CE) outcomes (e.g., Lessmann et al, 2009Lessmann et al, , 2012. A CE is a contest between at least two rival participants, where (generally) one winner is declared and the outcome is uncertain, such as political elections or sporting events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forecasts still remain far from perfect, and may fall short of reaching society's expectations for timely and reliable warnings. Therefore, the need arises to improve prediction system by, for example, through combing physical and empirical models (Goetz et al, 2011;Ziervogel et al, 2005;Lessmann et al, 2012). Several studies of empirical modelling have been carried out to predict stream-flow (OpitzStapleton et al, 2007;Barnston et al, 1999;Tisseuil et al, 2010;Krzysztofowicz., 1999;Goetz et al, 2011;Maier et al, 2000); however most of these approaches still have short-comings to skilfully predict the flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%