2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2021.107111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method to determine AgCl(1% mol)/Ag electrode potential versus the standard chloride electrode potential in a LiCl-KCl eutectic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Ref. 13, the AgCl/Ag electrode potential was −1.13 V vs Cl 2 /Cl − at 673 K in LiCl-KCl eutectic. So, all potentials in this work were transferred to the potentials referred to the Cl 2 /Cl − .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Ref. 13, the AgCl/Ag electrode potential was −1.13 V vs Cl 2 /Cl − at 673 K in LiCl-KCl eutectic. So, all potentials in this work were transferred to the potentials referred to the Cl 2 /Cl − .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, ternary coating was favored on graphite and Ni-Co-Cu was employed, based on the outstanding performance of binary coatings combining Ni-Co and Ni-Cu in the literature (Solmaz et al, 2008;Solmaz et al, 2009;Demirdelen et al, 2020). Considering the literature, the coating's Co and Cu mole ratios should be kept low in comparison to the Ni mole ratio (Mert and Kardaş, 2011;Sun et al, 2021). The electrodeposition of nickel, cobalt and copper was performed by galvanostatically using Iviumstat Electrochemical Interface with a three-electrode configuration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, several studies have been published that define the Ag/AgCl reference electrode versus the Cl -/Cl2 reaction, but the work typically assumes that the free chlorine content of their electrolyte is unity while https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-p5l5m ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4739-9907 Content not peer-reviewed by ChemRxiv. License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 varying the partial pressure of chlorine 2,3 or assumes the partial pressure of Cl2 generated during transient measurements is one 4,5 . These discrepancies in approach highlight the difficulties in calibrating measurements to a standard anodic electrode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%