1976
DOI: 10.1154/s0376030800011812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Method for yhe Determination of the Texture of Materials of Cubic Structure From Incomplete Reflection Pole Figures

Abstract: The main characteristics of a new method of texture analysis are presented as well aa a comparative study of the results obtained with three different methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detailed comparisons between the numerical results of the ODF analysis from diffraction spectra, by the present method and the classic HM, are summarized in Table 1. The accuracy criterion of recalculated intensity is given by the parameter R (Ruer & Baro, 1977),…”
Section: Model Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detailed comparisons between the numerical results of the ODF analysis from diffraction spectra, by the present method and the classic HM, are summarized in Table 1. The accuracy criterion of recalculated intensity is given by the parameter R (Ruer & Baro, 1977),…”
Section: Model Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orientation distribution function (ODF) of a polycrystalline material is generally determined from polefigure data by the various pole-figure inversion methods such as the harmonic method (HM) (Bunge, 1965;Roe, 1965), the vector method (VM) (Ruer & Baro, 1977;Vadon, 1981) and the WIMV method (Matthies & Vinel, 1982). Recently, X-ray (or neutron) diffraction spectra have been used to determine the ODFs of some polycrystalline materials (Wenk, Matthies & Lutterotti, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) The discretization method (vector method) (Williams, 1968 andRuer andBaro, 1977) 2) The series expansion method (harmonic method) (Bunge, 1965 and Roe, 1965) 3) The probabilistic method (Imhof, 1977) 4) The integral transformation method (inversion formula) (Mat- thies, 1979) Each of these methods has its specific advantages and disadvantages but in principle they all provide the complete solution to Eq. (4) which is unique if the pole figures are known for all crystal directions h, i.e.…”
Section: Texture Determination By Pole Figure Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(18), only in Z but not outside, the approximation function f(g) is defined in the whole orientation space. An approximation to the complete ODF f(g) in the non-zero-range is thus given by fLL(g) fL(g) + fiL(g) (20) as is shown schematically in Figure 2.…”
Section: Determination Of An Approximation To (G) By Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the uncertainty range off(g) is limited by the positivity condition (Bunge & Esling, 1979), and a good approximation to f(g) can be obtained from only one incomplete pole figure by the use of an 'iterative-expansion method' (Dahms & Bunge, 1989). Ruer & Baro (1977) suggested the vector method to analyze the ODF to solve the problem of the zone of negative values. Using vectors to stand for the ODF and the pole figures and with the help of their geometric relationship, they always obtain a non-negative ODE In paper I (Yu, Guo, Hendrix, Xu & He, 1995), we show that the number of pole figures should increase as the resolution of each pole figure increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%