2005
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2005.3.372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for three‐dimensional visualization and quantification of biogenic structures in aquatic sediments using axial tomodensitometry

Abstract: Biogenic structures formed by the activity of macro-and meiobenthic organisms exert a great influence on the physical, chemical, and biological properties of sediments. Although bioturbation processes are recognized as ecologically important, the characterization and quantification of biogenic structures produced by benthic organisms remain difficult. Several techniques (e.g., resin casting, X-radiography) were previously used to quantify these structures. However, due to a lack of definition, entire burrows, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanism by which a crack becomes a cylindrical burrow is not known, but is an important area for future research. Permanent burrows are clearly present and abundant in sediments [47,48], but whether burrowers can move through sediments without leaving a permanent trace is, quite literally, unclear. It is also important to note that both the elastic modulus, E, and fracture toughness, G c , increase with depth in the sediment due to compaction, and that grain size (and therefore cohesion) has a strong effect on both properties, but more research on the depth-dependence of these properties is needed [49].…”
Section: Burrowing In Mudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism by which a crack becomes a cylindrical burrow is not known, but is an important area for future research. Permanent burrows are clearly present and abundant in sediments [47,48], but whether burrowers can move through sediments without leaving a permanent trace is, quite literally, unclear. It is also important to note that both the elastic modulus, E, and fracture toughness, G c , increase with depth in the sediment due to compaction, and that grain size (and therefore cohesion) has a strong effect on both properties, but more research on the depth-dependence of these properties is needed [49].…”
Section: Burrowing In Mudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the pioneering work by Perez et al (1999), the use of CT for analyzing biogenic structures in marine sediments have been used in several Canadian studies (Mermillod-Blondin et al 2003, Dufour et al 2005. In these studies (op.…”
Section: Ct and Other Techniques For Analysing Biogenic Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this simplified analysis did not separate structures connected to the sediment surface from those that were not connected, and the analytical technique did not include the biovolume of animals living within shells or dense worm tubes. Although the method was improved in the latter study to obtain a better and quicker analysis, it is not clear how accurate the assessments were because most of the water within the cores had leaked out before scanning (Dufour et al 2005). Another technique used to analyse biogenic structures in sediment was to slice sediment in thin sections and to digitally analyse each section for structures such as burrows, tubes and shells (Rosenberg & Ringdahl 2005).…”
Section: Ct and Other Techniques For Analysing Biogenic Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In sediments, bioturbation (i.e., the diffusion-like transport caused by fauna activity) will influence the overall transport of DO (Aller 1980). Benthic organisms can construct complex structures in the sediment column and form sediment pores with various shapes and sizes that may or may not be permanent (Dufour et al 2005). These structures may be actively ventilated by their inhabitants and thus possess higher DO levels (Aller and Aller 1998;Kristensen 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%