2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2018.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for the recovery and evidential comparison of footwear impressions using 3D structured light scanning

Abstract: Footwear impressions are one of the most common forms of evidence to be found at a crime scene, and can potentially offer the investigator a wealth of intelligence. Our aim is to highlight a new and improved technique for the recovery of footwear impressions, using three-dimensional structured light scanning. Results from this preliminary study demonstrate that this new approach is non-destructive, safe to use and is fast, reliable and accurate. Further, since this is a digital method, there is also the option… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…41,44 Moreover, the scanning must be preceded by the geometric calibration process that uses a very robust and accurate algorithm. [46][47][48][49][50] However, the 3D reconstruction process of the injuries of the live subjects faced some difficulties, for example, slight change of the posture of the scanned area (mainly areas of the lower limb) caused overlapping artefact in the final 3D result; however, scanning the area more than three times and post-processing only the scans that had the same posture solved this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…41,44 Moreover, the scanning must be preceded by the geometric calibration process that uses a very robust and accurate algorithm. [46][47][48][49][50] However, the 3D reconstruction process of the injuries of the live subjects faced some difficulties, for example, slight change of the posture of the scanned area (mainly areas of the lower limb) caused overlapping artefact in the final 3D result; however, scanning the area more than three times and post-processing only the scans that had the same posture solved this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pico Scan 3D scanner has been used in some forensic works and shown to be effective in scanning some materials of forensic interest, such as footwear impression, human skeleton remains as well as bare different areas of the human body of live subjects. [46][47][48][49] It has also been used in non-Forensic work. 50…”
Section: Documentation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional imaging, virtual environments, and simulations are now becoming commonplace in the reconstruction and documentation of crime scenes, artefacts, and skeletal evidence [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Ampanozi et al [17] demonstrated that the use of 3D reconstructions and colour-coded CT images were a preferred visual format for district attorneys for understanding radiological findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article Komar et al (2012) stated that the software allows comparison between the two datasets and that the resulting 3D model is a useful tool for courtroom demonstration. This comparison has since been demonstrated by Thompson and Norris (2018), who evidenced the reliability of using structured light scanning. However, it has been noted that further work is needed before the structured light technique can replace traditional casting techniques (Thompson and Norris 2018;Crabbe et al 2015).…”
Section: 41mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Structured light scanning has the ability to capture geometric, morphometric, and colour surface data (Sansoni 2009). Like the laser-based methods, Thompson and Norris (2018) demonstrated that structured light scanning is non-destructive, has fast acquisition and processing times, is portable, accurate, and reliable. The high computational power required to process the scan data is noted as a limitation (McPherron 2009).…”
Section: Structured Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%